Implicit Learning and Dyslexia

被引:52
作者
Folia, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Udden, Julia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Forkstam, Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ingvar, Martin [2 ,4 ]
Hagoort, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Petersson, Karl Magnus [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6500 AH Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm Brain Inst, Cognit Neurophysiol Res Grp, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Algarve, Cognit Neurosci Res Grp, Faro, Portugal
来源
LEARNING, SKILL ACQUISITION, READING, AND DYSLEXIA | 2008年 / 1145卷
关键词
artificial grammar learning; structural mere-exposure effect; dyslexia; inferior frontal cortex; basal ganglia;
D O I
10.1196/annals.1416.012
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Several studies have reported an association between dyslexia and implicit learning deficits. It has been suggested that the weakness in implicit learning observed in dyslexic individuals may be related to sequential processing and implicit sequence learning. In the present article, we review the current literature on implicit learning and dyslexia. We describe a novel, forced-choice structural "mere exposure" artificial grammar learning paradigm and characterize this paradigm in normal readers in relation to the standard grammaticality classification paradigm. We argue that preference classification is a more optimal measure of the outcome of implicit acquisition since in the preference version participants are kept completely unaware of the underlying generative mechanism, while in the grammaticality version, the subjects have, at least in principle, been informed about the existence of an underlying complex set of rules at the point of classification (but not during acquisition). On the basis of the "mere exposure effect," we tested the prediction that the development of preference will correlate with the grammaticality status of the classification items. In addition, we examined the effects of grammaticality (grammatical/nongrammatical) and associative chunk strength (ACS; high/low) on the classification tasks (preference/grammaticality). Using a balanced ACS design in which the factors of grammaticality (grammatical/nongrammatical) and ACS (high/low) were independently controlled in a 2 x 2 factorial design, we confirmed our predictions. We discuss the suitability of this task for further investigation of the implicit learning characteristics in dyslexia.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 150
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[21]   The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia - An overview and working hypothesis [J].
Habib, M .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :2373-2399
[22]   On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework [J].
Hagoort, P .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (09) :416-423
[23]   The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? [J].
Hauser, MD ;
Chomsky, N ;
Fitch, WT .
SCIENCE, 2002, 298 (5598) :1569-1579
[24]  
Hopcroft JE., 2000, INTRO AUTOMATA THEOR
[25]   Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning [J].
Howard, James H., Jr. ;
Howard, Darlene V. ;
Japikse, Karin C. ;
Eden, Guinevere F. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (07) :1131-1144
[26]  
Karmiloff-Smith A., 1992, MODULARITY DEV PERSP
[27]   Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a word [J].
KarmiloffSmith, A ;
Grant, J ;
Sims, K ;
Jones, MC ;
Cuckle, P .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (02) :197-219
[28]  
Kelly Steve W, 2002, Dyslexia, V8, P43, DOI 10.1002/dys.208
[29]   Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information [J].
Knowlton, BJ ;
Squire, LR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (01) :169-181
[30]   An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design [J].
Lieberman, MD ;
Chang, GY ;
Chiao, J ;
Bookheimer, SY ;
Knowlton, BJ .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (03) :427-438