Soft Subexponentials and Multiplexing

被引:6
作者
Kanovich, Max [1 ,2 ]
Kuznetsov, Stepan [2 ,3 ]
Nigam, Vivek [4 ,5 ]
Scedrov, Andre [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
[2] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
[3] RAS, Steklov Math Inst, Moscow, Russia
[4] Univ Fed Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil
[5] Fortiss GmbH, Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
AUTOMATED REASONING, PT I | 2020年 / 12166卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-51074-9_29
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Linear logic and its refinements have been used as a specification language for a number of deductive systems. This has been accomplished by carefully studying the structural restrictions of linear logic modalities. Examples of such refinements are subexponentials, light linear logic, and soft linear logic. We bring together these refinements of linear logic in a non-commutative setting. We introduce a non-commutative substructural system with subexponential modalities controlled by a minimalistic set of rules. Namely, we disallow the contraction and weakening rules for the exponential modality and introduce two primitive subexponentials. One of the subexponentials allows the multiplexing rule in the style of soft linear logic and light linear logic. The second subexponential provides the exchange rule. For this system, we construct a sequent calculus, establish cut elimination, and also provide a complete focused proof system. We illustrate the expressive power of this system by simulating Turing computations and categorial grammar parsing for compound sentences. Using the former, we prove undecidability results. The new system employs Lambek's non-emptiness restriction, which is incompatible with the standard (sub)exponential setting. Lambek's restriction is crucial for applications in linguistics: without this restriction, categorial grammars incorrectly mark some ungrammatical phrases as being correct.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 517
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Andreoli J. M., 1992, Journal of Logic and Computation, V2, P297, DOI 10.1093/logcom/2.3.297
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Categorial grammar. Logical syntax, semantics, and processing
[3]  
Barry G., 1991, PROOF FIGURES STRUCT, DOI DOI 10.3115/977180.977215
[4]  
Carpenter Bob., 1998, Type-Logical Semantics
[5]   A linear logical framework [J].
Cervesato, I ;
Pfenning, F .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2002, 179 (01) :19-75
[6]   A linear logical framework [J].
Cervesato, I ;
Pfenning, F .
11TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON LOGIC IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :264-275
[7]   LINEAR LOGIC [J].
GIRARD, JY .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1987, 50 (01) :1-102
[8]   Light linear logic [J].
Girard, JY .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 1998, 143 (02) :175-204
[9]  
Godart-Wendling B, 2012, TRAIT AUTOM LANG, V53, P212
[10]  
Kanovich M., 2016, LNCS, V9804, P240, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3, 10.1007/978-3-662-53042-914]