Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: A cross-national comparison

被引:46
|
作者
Vackar, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Ctr Environm, Prague 16200, Czech Republic
[2] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Global Change Res Ctr, Brno 60300, Czech Republic
关键词
Ecological Footprint; Biocapacity; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem wellbeing; Biophysical indicators; Environmental sustainability; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; HUMAN APPROPRIATION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity have been compared with several commonly used environmental indices measuring various aspects of ecological sustainability and biodiversity. We found that the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity are closely related especially to the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). On the other hand, the Ecological Footprint is negatively related to other measures of ecosystem health and biodiversity such as the Ecosystem Wellbeing Index (EWI). We explored patterns of correlation between the Ecological Footprint and ecosystem and biodiversity measures, including threatened species numbers. Our results support previous findings that human economic activity and environmental pressures are related to threats to biodiversity. This analysis provides evidence that the Ecological Footprint is a meaningful ecological indicator which can be compared to equivalent measures of the appropriation of ecosystem productive capacity and land use pressures. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator
    Bagliani, Marco
    Bravo, Giangiacomo
    Dalmazzone, Silvana
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (03) : 650 - 661
  • [42] Greening the globe: Uncovering the impact of environmental policy, renewable energy, and innovation on ecological footprint
    Appiah, Michael
    Li, Mingxing
    Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr
    Karim, Sitara
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 192
  • [43] A path towards environmental sustainability: The role of clean energy and democracy in ecological footprint of Pakistan
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Caglar, Abdullah Emre
    Murshed, Muntasir
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 358
  • [44] The Ecological Footprint as an Assesment tool of the Supply Chain Environmental Performance Case of a retail trade tunisian company
    Feki, Noura
    Chabchoub, Habib
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LOGISTICS & TRANSPORT (ICALT 2014), 2014, : 222 - 228
  • [45] Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint
    Saravia-Cortez, A. M.
    Herva, M.
    Garcia-Dieguez, C.
    Roca, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 52 : 301 - 308
  • [46] Investigating environmental awareness of citizens of Azerbaijan: a survey on ecological footprint
    Gurbuz, Ismail Bulent
    Nesirov, Elcin
    Ozkan, Gulay
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (07) : 10378 - 10396
  • [47] THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: IS VALID THE ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE?
    Tothova, Dominika
    Turcinek, Jan
    19TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2016, : 634 - 640
  • [48] The environmental impacts of consumption at a subnational level - The ecological footprint of Cardiff
    Collins, Andrea
    Flynn, Andrew
    Wiedrnann, Thomas
    Barrett, John
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 10 (03) : 9 - 24
  • [49] Ecologically Unequal Exchange, World Polity, and Biodiversity Loss A Cross-National Analysis of Threatened Mammals
    Shandra, John M.
    Leckband, Christopher
    McKinney, Laura A.
    London, Bruce
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 50 (3-4) : 285 - 310
  • [50] Power and Politics in the World-System A Cross-National Analysis of Environmental Governance
    Sommer, Jamie M.
    Hargrove, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (02) : 263 - 287