Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: A cross-national comparison

被引:46
|
作者
Vackar, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Ctr Environm, Prague 16200, Czech Republic
[2] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Global Change Res Ctr, Brno 60300, Czech Republic
关键词
Ecological Footprint; Biocapacity; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem wellbeing; Biophysical indicators; Environmental sustainability; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; HUMAN APPROPRIATION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity have been compared with several commonly used environmental indices measuring various aspects of ecological sustainability and biodiversity. We found that the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity are closely related especially to the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). On the other hand, the Ecological Footprint is negatively related to other measures of ecosystem health and biodiversity such as the Ecosystem Wellbeing Index (EWI). We explored patterns of correlation between the Ecological Footprint and ecosystem and biodiversity measures, including threatened species numbers. Our results support previous findings that human economic activity and environmental pressures are related to threats to biodiversity. This analysis provides evidence that the Ecological Footprint is a meaningful ecological indicator which can be compared to equivalent measures of the appropriation of ecosystem productive capacity and land use pressures. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Sustainability in India: The Effects of Financial Development and Green Energy on Ecological Footprint
    Ozbek, Bahar
    Ozbek, Sefa
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2024, 29 (01) : 203 - 215
  • [32] Generalized trust and early Internet usage in cross-national comparison
    Bornschier, V
    KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2001, 53 (02): : 233 - +
  • [33] Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts at the urban scale: the ecological footprint of a university campus
    Genta, C.
    Favaro, S.
    Sonetti, G.
    Fracastoro, G. V.
    Lombardi, P.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (04) : 5826 - 5845
  • [34] Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Biodiversity Loss: A Cross-National Analysis of Threatened Mammals and Birds
    Shandra, John M.
    McKinney, Laura A.
    Leckband, Christopher
    London, Bruce
    HUMAN ECOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 17 (01) : 18 - 33
  • [35] Ecological Footprint as an Indicator of Corporate Environmental Performance-Empirical Evidence from Hungarian SMEs
    Szennay, Aron
    Szigeti, Cecilia
    Beke, Judit
    Radacsi, Laszlo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [36] Is there a link between cognitive abilities and environmental awareness? Cross-national evidence
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 166 : 86 - 90
  • [37] Comparison of the use of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint methods for evaluating environmental performances in dairy production
    Biagetti, E.
    Gislon, G.
    Zucali, M.
    Bava, L.
    Franco, S.
    Sandrucci, A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 905
  • [38] A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator
    Bagliani, Marco
    Bravo, Giangiacomo
    Dalmazzone, Silvana
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (03) : 650 - 661
  • [39] Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation
    Sohag, Kazi
    Husain, Shaiara
    Soytas, Ugur
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 136
  • [40] Framework for the inter-comparison of ecological footprint of universities
    Nunes, L. M.
    Catarino, A.
    Ribau Teixeira, M.
    Cuesta, E. M.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 32 : 276 - 284