Numerical verification of a biaxial tensile test method using a cruciform specimen

被引:118
作者
Hanabusa, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Takizawa, Hideo [2 ]
Kuwabara, Toshihiko [3 ]
机构
[1] Universal Can Corp, Dept Dev, Oyama, Shizuoka 4101392, Japan
[2] Mitsubishi Mat Corp, Cent Res Inst, Kitamoto, Saitama 3640022, Japan
[3] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Div Adv Mech Syst Engn, Inst Engn, Koganei, Tokyo 1848588, Japan
关键词
Sheet metal; Finite element method; Biaxial tension; Isotropy; Yield function; ANISOTROPIC YIELD FUNCTIONS; ALUMINUM-ALLOY SHEETS; STRAIN PATH CHANGE; HARDENING CHARACTERISTICS; ACCURACY; SURFACE; DESIGN; STEEL; METAL; LOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A method of evaluating stress measurement errors in biaxial tensile tests using a cruciform specimen is proposed. The cruciform specimen is assumed to be fabricated from a section of uniformly thick flat sheet metal via laser or water-jet cutting and to have a number of parallel slits cut into each of the four arms. Using finite element analyses with the von Mises yield criterion, the optimum geometry of the cruciform specimen and the optimum strain measurement position necessary to minimize the stress measurement error are determined. Additionally, an experimental validation of the FEA is performed using a sheet material that was experimentally confirmed to be nearly isotropic. The following conclusions are drawn: (i) the thickness of the test material should be less than 0.08B (B: side length of the gauge area of the cruciform specimen): (ii) the geometric parameters for the cruciform specimen should be N >= 7, L >= B, w(s) <= 0.01B, and 0.0034 <= R/B <= 0.1 (N: number of slits, L: length of slits cut into the arms, w(s): slit width, and R: corner radius at the junction of the arms to the gauge area); and (iii) the strain components in the gauge area should be measured on the centerline of the specimen parallel to the maximum force direction at a distance of approximately 0.35B from the center of the specimen. The stress measurement error is estimated to be less than 2% when the optimum conditions above are satisfied. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 970
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - part 1: theory [J].
Barlat, F ;
Brem, JC ;
Yoon, JW ;
Chung, K ;
Dick, RE ;
Lege, DJ ;
Pourgoghrat, F ;
Choi, SH ;
Chu, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2003, 19 (09) :1297-1319
[2]   A NEW DIRECT BIAXIAL TESTING MACHINE FOR ANISOTROPIC MATERIALS [J].
BOEHLER, JP ;
DEMMERLE, S ;
KOSS, S .
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1994, 34 (01) :1-9
[3]  
Borsutzki M, 2002, WERKST 2002 P DVM C, P186
[4]   OPTIMAL-DESIGN OF BIAXIAL TENSILE CRUCIFORM SPECIMENS [J].
DEMMERLE, S ;
BOEHLER, JP .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1993, 41 (01) :143-181
[5]  
FERRON G, 1988, J TEST EVAL, V16, P253, DOI 10.1520/JTE10375J
[6]   Specimen for a novel concept of the biaxial tension test [J].
Geiger, M ;
Hussnätter, W ;
Merklein, M .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 167 (2-3) :177-183
[7]   Experimental investigation of the biaxial behaviour of an aluminum sheet [J].
Green, DE ;
Neale, KW ;
MacEwen, SR ;
Makinde, A ;
Perrin, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2004, 20 (8-9) :1677-1706
[8]  
Hallfeldt T., 2002, FORTSCHR BER VDI R 2, V602
[9]  
Hanabusa Y, 2010, STEEL RES INT, V81, P1376
[10]   A review of planar biaxial tensile test systems for sheet metal [J].
Hannon, Alan ;
Tiernan, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 198 (1-3) :1-13