Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Initiating Adjunctive Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment

被引:6
作者
Broder, Michael S. [1 ]
Greene, Mallik [2 ]
Yan, Tingjian [1 ]
Chang, Eunice [1 ]
Hartry, Ann [3 ]
Yermilov, Irina [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Analyt Res LLC, Beverly Hills, CA USA
[2] Otsuka Pharmaceut Dev & Commercializat Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Lundbeck, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
atypical antipsychotic; health care utilization; major depressive disorder; costs; medication adherence; secondary data analysis; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; AUGMENTATION; GUIDELINES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare medication adherence, health care utilization, and cost among patients receiving adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with brexpiprazole, quetiapine, or lurasidone. Methods: Using Truven Health MarketScan (R) Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental Databases, we identified adults with MDD initiating adjunctive treatment with brexpiprazole, quetiapine, or lurasidone (index atypical antipsychotic [AAP]). We compared medication adherence and persistence measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) and treatment duration of index AAP, all-cause and psychiatric hospital care (hospitalization or emergency department visit), and medical costs during 6-month follow-up. Models performed included logistic regression for hospital care, linear regression for PDC and cost, and Cox proportional hazards regression for time to discontinuation, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and utilization differences during the 6 months before index AAP. Findings: The total sample included 778 brexpiprazole, 626 lurasidone, and 3458 quetiapine therapy initiators. Adjusting for baseline differences, the risk of discontinuation of index AAP was statistically significantly higher for quetiapine than for brexpiprazole (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; P = 0.023) and did not differ between lurasidone and brexipiprazole (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.29; P = 0.054). The adjusted rate of all-cause hospitalization or emergency department visit in the postindex period was lowest for brexpiprazole at 27.4% (95% CI, 24.0%-31.0%), compared with 31.1% (95% CI, 27.3%-35.2%) for lurasidone and 35.3% (95% CI, 33.5%-37.1%) for quetiapine (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Quetiapine users had increased all-cause costs compared with brexpiprazole users (estimate = $2309; 95% CI, $31 $4587; P = 0.047); all-cause medical costs did not differ between lurasidone and brexpiprazole (estimate = $913; 95% CI, $-2033 $3859; P = 0.543). Adjusted psychiatric hospital care, psychiatric costs, and PDC did not differ significantly among the groups. Implications: In patients with MDD and a variety of insurance types, brexpiprazole use was associated with statistically significantly lower risks of discontinuation, risk of hospital care (hospitalization and ED visits), and all-cause medical costs compared with adjunctive quetiapine. Differences between brexpiprazole and lurasidone were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that drug choice is associated with subsequent health care utilization and costs. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 232
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MAJ DEPR AD
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, HCUP CHRON COND IND
  • [3] [Anonymous], PRACTICE GUIDELINE T
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, DEPR AD REC MAN
  • [5] World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 1: Update 2013 on the acute and continuation treatment of unipolar depressive disorders
    Bauer, Michael
    Pfennig, Andrea
    Severus, Emanuel
    Whybrow, Peter C.
    Angst, Jules
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 14 (05) : 334 - 385
  • [6] Bose J, 2016, NSDUH SER H, V51
  • [7] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [8] Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines
    Cleare, Anthony
    Pariante, C. M.
    Young, A. H.
    Anderson, I. M.
    Christmas, D.
    Cowen, P. J.
    Dickens, C.
    Ferrier, I. N.
    Geddes, J.
    Gilbody, S.
    Haddad, P. M.
    Katona, C.
    Lewis, G.
    Malizia, A.
    McAllister-Williams, R. H.
    Ramchandani, P.
    Scott, J.
    Taylor, D.
    Uher, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 29 (05) : 459 - 525
  • [9] The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: Report of the Texas Consensus Conference Panel on medication treatment of major depressive disorder
    Crismon, ML
    Trivedi, M
    Pigott, TA
    Rush, AJ
    Hirschfeld, RMA
    Kahn, DA
    DeBattista, C
    Nelson, JC
    Nierenberg, AA
    Sackeim, HA
    Thase, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (03) : 142 - 156
  • [10] Adding Psychotherapy to Pharmacotherapy in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Adults: A Meta-Analysis
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Dekker, Jack
    Hollon, Steven D.
    Andersson, Gerhard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 70 (09) : 1219 - 1229