共 50 条
Does pelvic venous congestion syndrome exist and can it be treated?
被引:11
|作者:
Ball, Elizabeth
[1
,2
]
Khan, Khalid S.
[1
,2
]
Meads, Catherine
[1
]
机构:
[1] Royal London Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词:
Pelvic venous congestion syndrome;
pelvic venous reflux;
chronic pelvic pain;
ovarian artery embolization;
evidence based review;
OVARIAN VEIN EMBOLIZATION;
PAIN;
WOMEN;
EMBOLOTHERAPY;
INCOMPETENCE;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MORBIDITY;
VARICES;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01368.x
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and costly health problem in gynecology. Operative pathological findings are often absent. In some women with CPP, pelvic venous congestion has been reported; however, this observation has also been made in asymptomatic women. Thus, it is not clear whether pelvic venous congestion causes CPP and, if it does, whether it is a direct or indirect cause. Venography and non-invasive imaging methods are used for the diagnosis, but scoring systems have not been validated. The current mainstay of treatment is venography-controlled embolization, which is less invasive than surgical interventions. However, the only evidence on effectiveness comes from uncontrolled case series. A systematic review of causation evidence is needed to prove whether pelvic venous congestion causes CPP and whether embolization treatment is effective. In addition, if causation is established, good-quality primary randomized controlled trials on embolization may be required.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 528
页数:4
相关论文