Validation of the Triage Risk Stratification Tool to Identify Older Persons at Risk for Hospital Admission and Returning to the Emergency Department

被引:33
作者
Lee, Jacques S. [1 ]
Schwindt, Graeme [2 ]
Langevin, Mara [5 ]
Moghabghab, Rola
Alibhai, Shabbir M. H. [3 ,6 ,8 ]
Kiss, Alex [4 ,7 ]
Naglie, Gary [3 ,4 ,6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Div Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Tronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
predictive value of tests; emergency medicine; geriatrics; adverse outcomes; clinical prediction rule;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01959.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
To assess the predictive validity of the Triage Risk Stratification Tool (TRST) to identify return to the emergency department (ED) or hospitalization in a multicenter patient sample. Prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up. EDs of three hospitals in Toronto, Canada. Seven hundred eighty-eight subjects aged 65 to 101 (mean age 76.6, 58.5% female) who presented to the ED and were discharged home from the ED. Trained clinical assessors completed the TRST on patients aged 65 and older during a 4-week study period. Patients who subsequently returned to the ED or were admitted to the hospital were identified using hospital information systems and classified as experiencing the composite endpoint at 30, 120, and 365 days. The mean TRST score was 1.55 (range 0-5), and 147 (18.7%) patients experienced the composite endpoint of return to the ED or hospital admission by 30 days. The sensitivity of a TRST score of 2 or greater was 62%, (95% confidence interval (CI)=54-70%), specificity was 57% (95% CI=53-61%), and likelihood ratio was 1.44 (95% CI=1.23-1.66). The area under the curve was 0.61 using a cutoff score of 2. The TRST demonstrated only moderate predictive ability, and ideally, a better prediction rule should be sought. Future studies to develop better prediction rules should compare their performance with that of existing prediction rules, including the TRST and Identifying Seniors at Risk tool, and assess the effect of any new prediction rule on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2112 / 2117
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions [J].
Aminzadeh, F ;
Dalziel, WB .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 39 (03) :238-247
[2]   A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT UNIT IN A COMMUNITY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL [J].
APPLEGATE, WB ;
MILLER, ST ;
GRANEY, MJ ;
ELAM, JT ;
BURNS, R ;
AKINS, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (22) :1572-1578
[3]  
Armitage P, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2675
[4]   The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment [J].
Bandiera, G ;
Stiell, IG ;
Wells, GA ;
Clement, C ;
De Maio, V ;
Vandemheen, KL ;
Greenberg, GH ;
Lesiuk, H ;
Brison, R ;
Cass, D ;
Dreyer, J ;
Eisenhauer, MA ;
MacPhail, L ;
McKnight, RD ;
Morrison, L ;
Reardon, M ;
Schull, M ;
Worthington, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (03) :395-402
[5]   Statistical methodology .1. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity [J].
Buderer, NMF .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 3 (09) :895-900
[6]   Risk of admission within 4 weeks of discharge of elderly patients from the emergency department - the DEED study [J].
Caplan, GA ;
Brown, A ;
Croker, WD ;
Doolan, J .
AGE AND AGEING, 1998, 27 (06) :697-702
[7]   Predictive validity of the Triage Risk Screening Tool for elderly patients in a Canadian emergency department [J].
Fan, Jerome ;
Worster, Andrew ;
Fernandes, Christopher M. B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 24 (05) :540-544
[8]  
Grief C Lynne, 2003, J Emerg Nurs, V29, P122, DOI 10.1067/men.2003.65
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]  
Harrell F., 2002, REGRESSION MODELING