Two FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologs in Chenopodium rubrum differ in expression patterns

被引:35
作者
Chab, David [1 ]
Kolar, Jan [1 ]
Olson, Matthew S. [2 ,3 ]
Storchova, Helena [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Expt Bot VVI, CR-16502 Prague 6, Lysolaje, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Dept Biol & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Arctic Biol, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
关键词
Chenopodium; FLOWERING LOCUS T homologs; Flower induction; Gene expression; Night break;
D O I
10.1007/s00425-008-0792-3
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) like genes are crucial regulators (both positive and negative) of flowering in angiosperms. We identified two FT homologs in Chenopodium rubrum, a short-day species used as a model plant for the studies of photoperiodic flower induction. We found that CrFTL1 gene was highly inducible by a 12-h dark period, which in turn induced flowering. On the other hand, photoperiodic treatments that did not induce flowering (short dark periods, or a permissive darkness interrupted by a night break) caused only a slight increase in CrFTL1 mRNA level. We demonstrated diurnal oscillation of CrFTL1 expression with peaks in the middle of a light period. The oscillation persisted under constant darkness. Unlike FT homologs in rice and Pharbitis, the CrFTL1 expression under constant darkness was very low. The CrFTL2 gene showed constitutive expression. We suggest that the CrFTL1 gene may play a role as a floral regulator, but the function of CrFTL2 remains unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 940
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1 [J].
Ahn, JH ;
Miller, D ;
Winter, VJ ;
Banfield, MJ ;
Lee, JH ;
Yoo, SY ;
Henz, SR ;
Brady, RL ;
Weigel, D .
EMBO JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (03) :605-614
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Inferring Phylogenies
[3]   The shoot apex as a marker of the responsivity to photoperiodic treatment inducing flowering of Chenopodium rubrum L. [J].
Blazková, A ;
Vondráková, Z ;
Krekule, J .
BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2000, 43 (01) :31-34
[4]   A thermosensory pathway controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana [J].
Blázquez, MA ;
Ahn, JH ;
Weigel, D .
NATURE GENETICS, 2003, 33 (02) :168-171
[5]   Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis [J].
Bradley, D ;
Ratcliffe, O ;
Vincent, C ;
Carpenter, R ;
Coen, E .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5296) :80-83
[6]   The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato [J].
Carmel-Goren, L ;
Liu, YS ;
Lifschitz, E ;
Zamir, D .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 52 (06) :1215-1222
[7]   RHYTHMIC FLOWERING RESPONSES AND PHYTOCHROME CHANGES IN A SELECTION OF CHENOPODIUM RUBRUM [J].
CUMMING, BG ;
HENDRICKS, SB ;
BORTHWICK, HA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1965, 43 (07) :825-+
[8]  
Cumming BG, 1967, METHODS DEV BIOL, P277
[9]  
CUMMING BG, 1985, CRC HDB FLOWERING, V2, P96
[10]   Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-Iike gene expression independently of Hd1l [J].
Doi, K ;
Izawa, T ;
Fuse, T ;
Yamanouchi, U ;
Kubo, T ;
Shimatani, Z ;
Yano, M ;
Yoshimura, A .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 18 (08) :926-936