Making theory explicit - An analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory

被引:42
作者
Laksov, Klara Bolander [1 ,2 ]
Dornan, Tim [3 ,4 ]
Teunissen, Pim W. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Educ, Ctr Adv Univ Teaching, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Med, Dent & Biomed Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Maastricht Univ, Sch Hlth Profess Educ SHE, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, NL, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Medical Education; High Level Theory; Medical Education Research; Specific Perspective; Future Research Agenda;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-016-0848-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: As medical education develops into a varied and well-developed field of research, the issue of quality research anchored in or generating theory has gained increasing importance. Medical education researchers have been criticized of not connecting their work to relevant theory. This paper set out to analyse how researchers can connect to theory in medical education. The goal of this paper is to provide an accessible framework for those entering medical education research, regarding how theory may become an integral part of one's work. Methods: Fifteen purposefully selected researchers in medical education were asked to nominate papers they considered influential in medical education. Through this process 41 papers were identified and included in the study. Results: The papers were analysed with thematic content analysis, which resulted in three approaches to the use of theory: as close-up exploration; as a specific perspective; and as an overview. The approaches are exemplified by quotes from the papers included in our dataset and further illuminated by a metaphoric story. Conclusions: We conclude by pointing at the importance of making explicit how theory is used in medical education as a way to collaboratively take responsibility for the quality of medical education research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Research in medical education: Balancing service and science [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Hodges, Brian ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (01) :103-115
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHAT IS THIS THING C
[3]  
[Anonymous], BRIT MED J
[4]   Moving the field forward: Going beyond quantitative-qualitative [J].
Bordage, Georges .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (10) :S126-S128
[5]   Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify [J].
Bordage, Georges .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (04) :312-319
[6]  
Boyer ErnestL., 1991, College Teaching, V39, P11, DOI DOI 10.1080/87567555.1991.10532213
[7]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]   Making sense of differences between medical schools through Bourdieu's concept of 'field' [J].
Brosnan, Caragh .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (07) :645-652
[9]   Education without theory [J].
Carr, Wilfred .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 54 (02) :136-159
[10]   Theory Development and Application in Medical Education [J].
Cianciolo, Anna T. ;
Eva, Kevin W. ;
Colliver, Jerry A. .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2013, 25 :S75-S80