Resource allocation models' construction for the reduction of undesirable outputs based on DEA methods

被引:32
作者
Li, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wei [3 ]
Zhou, Zhixiang [4 ]
Huang, Chengming [5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, China Ctr Ind Secur Res, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Shanxi Univ, Sch Math Sci, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Hainan Univ, Haikou Hainan 570228, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Resource allocation; Undesirable outputs; DEA; Reduction proportion; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; PRODUCTIVITY; FIRMS; DISCLOSURE; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mcm.2012.10.026
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
During the fast developing process of the Chinese economy, China consumes lots of energy and environmental pollution caused by energy consumption currently urgently needs solving. So, paying more attention to energy saving and emission reduction is very important. Therefore, to reasonably allocate resources and reduce emissions in China's different regions has practical significance. So this paper firstly considers the model construction method for resource allocation considering undesirable outputs between different decision making units based on the DEA framework under the CRS and VRS assumption. We have proposed some resource allocation models as a multiple objective linear problem which considers the input reduction, desirable output reduction and undesirable output reduction. Then, to demonstrate the practical application of the resource allocation model, numerical examples are used to illustrate the approach. In addition, we explore the resource allocation problem of China's regions in 2006-2010. The empirical results show that the resource allocation models dealing with undesirable outputs have effective configuration results, that is, the reduction proportion for desirable output is smaller than the reduction proportion for undesirable output. From the resource allocation results in China's regions, we find that the eastern area has more emission reduction than the central and western areas corresponding to the same energy consumption reduction, and the energy and environmental policy should focus more on the central and western areas. All of these conclusions will give some policy recommendations on saving energy and reducing pollution emissions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 926
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (02) :173-187
[2]   Performance-based environmental index weights: Are all metrics created equal? [J].
Bellenger, Moriah J. ;
Herlihy, Alan T. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) :1043-1050
[3]   THE NONLINEAR RESOURCE-ALLOCATION PROBLEM [J].
BRETTHAUER, KM ;
SHETTY, B .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1995, 43 (04) :670-683
[4]   An approach for the two-group discriminant analysis: An application of DEA [J].
Chang, Dong Shang ;
Kuo, Yi Chun .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2008, 47 (9-10) :970-981
[5]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[6]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[7]   Regulatory factors shaping environmental performance at publicly-owned treatment plants [J].
Earnhart, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :655-681
[8]   Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation:: Comment [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 157 (01) :242-245
[9]   An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms - Application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities [J].
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Tyteca, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) :161-175
[10]  
FARE R, 1989, REV ECON STAT, V71, P90