SULFURHEXAFLUORIDE (SF6) VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) GAS AS TAMPONADE IN MACULAR HOLE SURGERY

被引:6
作者
Modi, Aditya [1 ]
Giridhar, Anantharaman [1 ]
Gopalakrishnan, Mahesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Giridhar Eye Inst, Vitreoretina Serv, Cochin, Kerala, India
来源
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES | 2017年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
anatomical outcomes; cataract incidence; endotamponade; functional outcomes; glaucoma incidence; macular hole surgery; perfluoropropane gas; recurrent macular hole; sulfurhexafluoride gas; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; SULFUR-HEXAFLUORIDE SF6; SILICONE OIL; VITRECTOMY; OUTCOMES; EXCHANGE; INJECTION; CLOSURE; REPAIR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare outcomes of macular hole surgery using sulfurhexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas. Methods: This is a retrospective, interventional, comparative study. A total of 177 eyes of 166 patients operated over a 3-year period for idiopathic macular holes were included. Sixty-seven eyes had tamponade with SF6 gas (Group 1), whereas 111 eyes received C3F8 (Group 2) as the tamponading agent. The primary outcome measure was the macular hole closure rate. Statistical analysis was done using SPSSv16. Results: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography-based stagewise distribution of macular holes were similar across both groups (P = 0.99). The hole closure rate was 57/ 66 (86.4%) with SF6 and 96/111 (86.5%) with C3F8 gas (P = 0.98). Subanalysis demonstrated no significant difference in closure rates regarding macular hole size, stage, or duration. Best-corrected visual acuity improved by a mean of 0.28 logMAR in the SF6 group (P = 0.00) and 0.42 logMAR in the C3F8 group, corresponding to 3 lines and 4 lines of improvement, respectively, on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (P < 0.05). The difference was not significant (P = 0.06). Rise in intraocular pressure was higher in the C3F8 group (P < 0.05). Progression of cataract was also greater in the C3F8 group (83.3 vs. 73.9%), but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Resurgery was done in 9/177 eyes. The closure rate with C3F8 and SF6 reinjections was 3/4 (75%) and 1/5 (20%). Moreover, anatomical hole closure after resurgeries was better in Group 1 (4/5 eyes) than in Group 2 (0/4 eyes). Conclusion: The macular hole closure rate was similar with sulfurhexafluoride and perfluoropropane, irrespective of hole size, stage, or duration. However, sulfurhexafluoride exhibited a decreased incidence of cataract and ocular hypertension with shorter tamponade duration. Perfluoropropane may have a role as the preferred endotamponading agent in failed primary surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 290
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
Ip MS, 2002, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V120, P29
[12]   Additional gas injection after failed macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling [J].
Iwase, Takeshi ;
Sugiyama, Kazuhisa .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (03) :214-219
[13]   United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database Study of Vitreoretinal Surgery: Report 2, Macular Hole [J].
Jackson, Timothy L. ;
Donachie, Paul H. J. ;
Sparrow, John M. ;
Johnston, Robert L. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) :629-634
[14]   Outpatient postoperative fluid-gas exchange after early failed vitrectomy surgery for macular hole [J].
Johnson, RN ;
McDonald, R ;
Schatz, H ;
Ai, E .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (12) :2009-2013
[15]   VITREOUS SURGERY FOR IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLES - RESULTS OF A PILOT-STUDY [J].
KELLY, NE ;
WENDEL, RT .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 109 (05) :654-659
[16]   OUTCOMES OF SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE (SF6) VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) GAS TAMPONADE FOR MACULAR HOLE SURGERY [J].
Kim, Sung Soo ;
Smiddy, William E. ;
Feuer, William J. ;
Shi, Wei .
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2008, 28 (10) :1408-1415
[17]   Comparison of silicone oil versus gas tamponade in the treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole [J].
Lai, JC ;
Stinnett, SS ;
McCuen, BW .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (06) :1170-1174
[18]   Treatment of stage 2 macular hole by intravitreous injection of expansile gas and induction of posterior vitreous detachment [J].
Mori, Keisuke ;
Saito, Sumiyo ;
Gehlbach, Peter L. ;
Yoneya, Shin .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (01) :127-133
[19]  
Nadal Jeroni, 2012, Retina, V32, P918, DOI 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318229b20e
[20]   Treatment of reopened macular hole after vitrectomy by laser and outpatient fluid-gas exchange [J].
Ohana, E ;
Blumenkranz, MS .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (08) :1398-1403