The Timing, the Treatment, the Question: Comparison of Epidemiologic Approaches to Minimize Immortal Time Bias in Real-World Data Using a Surgical Oncology

被引:16
作者
Duchesneau, Emilie D. [1 ]
Jackson, Bradford E. [2 ]
Webster-Clark, Michael [1 ]
Lund, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ]
Reeder-Hayes, Katherine E. [2 ,3 ]
Napoles, Anna M. [4 ]
Strassle, Paula D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Div Oncol, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Natl Inst Minor Hlth & Hlth Dispar, Div Intramural Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; PRIMARY TUMOR; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; THERAPY; WEIGHTS; BENEFIT; MODELS; TRIAL; SCORE;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0495
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Studies evaluating the effects of cancer treatments are prone to immortal time bias that, if unaddressed, can lead to treatments appearing more beneficial than they are.Methods: To demonstrate the impact of immortal time bias, we compared results across several analytic approaches (dichotomous exposure, dichotomous exposure excluding immortal time, time-varying exposure, landmark analysis, clone-censor-weight meth-od), using surgical resection among women with metastatic breast cancer as an example. All adult women diagnosed with incident metastatic breast cancer from 2013-2016 in the National Cancer Database were included. To quantify immortal time bias, we also conducted a simulation study where the "true" relationship between surgical resection and mortality was known.Results: 24,329 women (median age 61, IQR 51-71) were includ-ed, and 24% underwent surgical resection. The largest association between resection and mortality was observed when using a dichot-omized exposure [HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.57], followed by dichotomous with exclusion of immortal time (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.65). Results from the time-varying exposure, land-mark, and clone-censor-weight method analyses were closer to the null (HR, 0.67-0.84). Results from the plasmode simulation found that the time-varying exposure, landmark, and clone-censor-weight method models all produced unbiased HRs (bias -0.003 to 0.016). Both standard dichotomous exposure (HR, 0.84; bias, -0.177) and dichotomous with exclusion of immortal time (HR, 0.93; bias, -0.074) produced meaningfully biased estimates. Conclusions: Researchers should use time-varying exposures with a treatment assessment window or the clone-censor-weight method when immortal time is present.Impact: Using methods that appropriately account for immortal time will improve evidence and decision-making from research using real-world data.
引用
收藏
页码:2079 / 2086
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] American College of Surgeons, NAT CANC DAT
  • [2] ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL BY TUMOR RESPONSE
    ANDERSON, JR
    CAIN, KC
    GELBER, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 1 (11) : 710 - 719
  • [3] Surgery and survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer
    Arciero, Cletus
    Liu, Yuan
    Gillespie, Theresa
    Subhedar, Preeti
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (04) : 644 - 653
  • [4] An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) : 399 - 424
  • [5] Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial
    Badwe, Rajendra
    Hawaldar, Rohini
    Nair, Nita
    Kaushik, Rucha
    Parmar, Vani
    Siddique, Shabina
    Budrukkar, Ashwini
    Mittra, Indraneel
    Gupta, Sudeep
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (13) : 1380 - 1388
  • [6] Retraction of COVID-19 Pharmacoepidemiology Research Could Have Been Avoided by Effective Use of Reporting Guidelines
    Benchimol, Eric, I
    Moher, David
    Ehrenstein, Vera
    Langan, Sinead M.
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 12 : 1403 - 1420
  • [7] The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
    Benchimol, Eric I.
    Smeeth, Liam
    Guttmann, Astrid
    Harron, Katie
    Moher, David
    Petersen, Irene
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    von Elm, Erik
    Langan, Sinead M.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (10)
  • [8] The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Stewart, Andrew K.
    Winchester, David P.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) : 683 - 690
  • [9] Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death
    Cain, Lauren E.
    Cole, Stephen R.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (12) : 1725 - 1738
  • [10] Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 168 (06) : 656 - 664