A dynamic and continuous allowances allocation methodology for the prevention of carbon leakage: Emission control coefficients

被引:41
作者
Sun, YongPing [1 ,2 ]
Xue, JinJun [1 ,3 ]
Shi, XunPeng [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, KeYing [1 ,2 ]
Qi, ShaoZhou [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wang, Lei [7 ]
Wang, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Econ, Ctr Hubei Cooperat Innovat Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Low Carbon Econ, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Australia China Relat Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Energy Studies Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Wuhan Univ, Climate Change & Energy Econ Study Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Informat Management & Stat, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Emissions trading system; Competitiveness; Carbon leakage; Allowance allocations; Developing countries; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; INDUSTRIAL SECTORS; EUROPEAN-UNION; TRADING MARKET; CLIMATE POLICY; EU; CHINA; ETS; ADJUSTMENTS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.095
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon leakage has become the core issue of emission trading systems. Using data from Hubei Province, this paper identifies the drawbacks of the prevailing methods for preventing carbon leakage and proposes a new methodology to overcome them, namely, Emission Control Coefficients. In contrast to the common tiered structure method, the Emission Control Coefficients generate a dynamic and continuous emission control coefficient for each industry which will improve the effectiveness and fairness of allowance allocation, set aside sufficient time for the low carbon transformation of industries, and balance the needs to protect competitiveness and decarbonize and are particularly suitable for the emission trading systems of developing counties. This paper makes three main academic contributions: Firstly, it proposes a new indicator, the abatement potential for more effective determining allowance allocation than the prevailing method. Secondly, it better distinguishes industrial differences. Thirdly, it can better respond to the problem of excess allowances that is due to technological advances and trade pattern changes.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 230
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Evaluating the carbon leakage effect on cement sector under different climate policies [J].
Allevi, Elisabetta ;
Oggioni, Giorgia ;
Riccardi, Rossana ;
Rocco, Marco .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 163 :320-337
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 5 Waste
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORK GROUP 3 MIT CLI
[4]   Heterogeneous firms and the environment: a cap-and-trade program [J].
Anoulies, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 :84-101
[5]   Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments [J].
Antimiani, Alessandro ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Kuik, Onno ;
Paglialunga, Elena .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 128 :246-259
[6]   Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage [J].
Antimiani, Alessandro ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Martini, Chiara ;
Salvatici, Luca ;
Tommasino, Maria Cristina .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :299-311
[7]   The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment [J].
Bednar-Friedl, Birgit ;
Schinko, Thomas ;
Steininger, Karl W. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S168-S180
[8]   Targeted carbon tariffs: Export response, leakage and welfare [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Bye, Brita ;
Faehn, Taran ;
Rosendahl, Knut Einar .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 50 :51-73
[9]   Consignment auctions of free emissions allowances [J].
Burtraw, Dallas ;
McCormack, Kristen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :337-344
[10]   Estimating carbon leakage and the efficiency of border adjustments in general equilibrium - Does sectoral aggregation matter? [J].
Caron, Justin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S111-S126