Snow Sublimation in Mountain Environments and Its Sensitivity to Forest Disturbance and Climate Warming

被引:86
作者
Sexstone, Graham A. [1 ,2 ]
Clow, David W. [1 ]
Fassnacht, Steven R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liston, Glen E. [4 ]
Hiemstra, Christopher A. [6 ]
Knowles, John F. [7 ,8 ]
Penn, Colin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Colorado Water Sci Ctr, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, EASC Watershed Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, ESS Watershed Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Cooperat Inst Res Atmosphere, Ft Collins, CO USA
[5] CSU, Geospatial Centroid, Ft Collins, CO USA
[6] US Army Cold Reg Res & Engn Lab, Ft Wainwright, AK USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[8] Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
sublimation; SnowModel; eddy covariance; Colorado Rocky Mountains; bark beetles; climate warming; SUB-ALPINE FOREST; ENERGY-BALANCE; TURBULENT FLUXES; BLOWING SNOW; UNITED-STATES; SURFACE SUBLIMATION; SEASONAL SNOWPACK; EDDY COVARIANCE; MODELING SYSTEM; ACCUMULATION;
D O I
10.1002/2017WR021172
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Snow sublimation is an important component of the snow mass balance, but the spatial and temporal variability of this process is not well understood in mountain environments. This study combines a process-based snow model (SnowModel) with eddy covariance (EC) measurements to investigate (1) the spatio-temporal variability of simulated snow sublimation with respect to station observations, (2) the contribution of snow sublimation to the ablation of the snowpack, and (3) the sensitivity and response of snow sublimation to bark beetle-induced forest mortality and climate warming across the north-central Colorado Rocky Mountains. EC-based observations of snow sublimation compared well with simulated snow sublimation at stations dominated by surface and canopy sublimation, but blowing snow sublimation in alpine areas was not well captured by the EC instrumentation. Water balance calculations provided an important validation of simulated sublimation at the watershed scale. Simulated snow sublimation across the study area was equivalent to 28% of winter precipitation on average, and the highest relative snow sublimation fluxes occurred during the lowest snow years. Snow sublimation from forested areas accounted for the majority of sublimation fluxes, highlighting the importance of canopy and sub-canopy surface sublimation in this region. Simulations incorporating the effects of tree mortality due to bark-beetle disturbance resulted in a 4% reduction in snow sublimation from forested areas. Snow sublimation rates corresponding to climate warming simulations remained unchanged or slightly increased, but total sublimation losses decreased by up to 6% because of a reduction in snow covered area and duration.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1211
页数:21
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Parameterizing Turbulent Exchange over Sea Ice in Winter
    Andreas, Edgar L.
    Persson, P. Ola G.
    Jordan, Rachel E.
    Horst, Thomas W.
    Guest, Peter S.
    Grachev, Andrey A.
    Fairall, Christopher W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) : 87 - 104
  • [2] [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG 2007
  • [3] [Anonymous], SRS213 USDA FOR SERV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1987, BOUNDARY LAYER CLIMA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, 20111238 US GEOL SUR
  • [6] [Anonymous], COMPLETION REP SERIE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1998, 67 WMO
  • [8] Mountain hydrology of the western United States
    Bales, Roger C.
    Molotch, Noah P.
    Painter, Thomas H.
    Dettinger, Michael D.
    Rice, Robert
    Dozier, Jeff
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (08)
  • [9] Bearup LA, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P481, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2198, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2198]
  • [10] Recent tree die-off has little effect on streamflow in contrast to expected increases from historical studies
    Biederman, Joel A.
    Somor, Andrew J.
    Harpold, Adrian A.
    Gutmann, Ethan D.
    Breshears, David D.
    Troch, Peter A.
    Gochis, David J.
    Scott, Russell L.
    Meddens, Arjan J. H.
    Brooks, Paul D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (12) : 9775 - 9789