Mandibular Incisive Canal: Cone Beam Computed Tomography

被引:65
作者
Pires, Carlos A.
Bissada, Nabil F. [1 ]
Becker, Jeffery J. [1 ]
Kanawati, Ali [2 ]
Landers, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodont, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Dent, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; mandibular incisive canal; panoramic radiography; INTERFORAMINAL REGION; IMPLANT-SURGERY; NERVE; APPEARANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00228.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Panoramic radiography is often used to analyze the anatomical structure of the teeth, jaws, and temporomandibular joints. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging allows multiple axial slices of the image to be obtained through these anatomical structures. The aim of this study was to assess CBCT compared with panoramic radiography to verify the presence, location, and dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal. Materials and Methods: CBCT scan images and panoramic radiographs of 89 subjects were compared for the presence of the mandibular incisive canal, its location, size, and anterior-posterior length. The distance between the incisive canal and the buccal and lingual plate of the alveolar bone, and the distance from the canal to the inferior border of the mandible and the tooth apex were also measured. A paired t-test was used to calculate any significant difference between the two imaging techniques. Results: Eighty-three percent of the CBCT scans showed the presence of the incisive canal, as did 11% of the panoramic radiographs. The range of the incisive canal diameter, as seen in the CBCT scans, was from 0.4 x 0.4 mm to 4.6 x 3.2 mm. The mean length of the canal was 7 +/- 3.8 mm. The distance from the inferior border of the mandible to the canal was 10.2 +/- 2.4 mm, and the mean distance to the buccal plate was 2.4 mm. The apex-canal distance (in dentate subjects) was 5.3 mm. Conclusion: The presence, location, and dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal are better determined by CBCT imaging than by panoramic radiography.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
CASSELMAN JW, 1988, J HEAD NECK PATHOL, V7, P255
[2]  
De Andrade E, 2001, INT J PERIODONT REST, V21, P591
[3]  
DuBrul EL., 1980, Sicher's Oral Anatomy
[4]  
Ekestubbe A, 1991, SWED DENT J S, V138, P1
[5]  
Garg A K, 1995, Implant Soc, V5, P7
[6]   The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: A literature review [J].
Greenstein, Gary ;
Tarnow, Dennis .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (12) :1933-1943
[7]  
Hanazawa T, 2004, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V15, P226
[8]   FIXTURE STABILITY AND NERVE FUNCTION AFTER TRANSPOSITION AND LATERALIZATION OF THE INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE AND FIXTURE INSTALLATION [J].
HIRSCH, JM ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 33 (05) :276-281
[9]   Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs [J].
Jacobs, R ;
Mraiwa, N ;
van Steenberghe, D ;
Sanderink, G ;
Quirynen, M .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2004, 26 (04) :329-333
[10]   Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan [J].
Jacobs, R ;
Mraiwa, N ;
vanSteenberghe, D ;
Gijbels, F ;
Quirynen, M .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (05) :322-327