Undersampling power-law size distributions: effect on the assessment of extreme natural hazards

被引:29
|
作者
Geist, Eric L. [1 ]
Parsons, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Extreme natural hazards; Catalog; Empirical; Power law; Undersampling; Pareto; Probability; GUTENBERG-RICHTER DISTRIBUTION; TSUNAMI HAZARD; TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE; FOREST-FIRES; FREQUENCY; MAGNITUDE; FLOOD; RISK; STATISTICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-013-1024-0
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The effect of undersampling on estimating the size of extreme natural hazards from historical data is examined. Tests using synthetic catalogs indicate that the tail of an empirical size distribution sampled from a pure Pareto probability distribution can range from having one-to-several unusually large events to appearing depleted, relative to the parent distribution. Both of these effects are artifacts caused by limited catalog length. It is more difficult to diagnose the artificially depleted empirical distributions, since one expects that a pure Pareto distribution is physically limited in some way. Using maximum-likelihood methods and the method of moments, we estimate the power-law exponent and the corner size parameter of tapered Pareto distributions for several natural hazard examples: tsunamis, floods, and earthquakes. Each of these examples has varying catalog lengths and measurement thresholds, relative to the largest event sizes. In many cases where there are only several orders of magnitude between the measurement threshold and the largest events, joint two-parameter estimation techniques are necessary to account for estimation dependence between the power-law scaling exponent and the corner size parameter. Results indicate that whereas the corner size parameter of a tapered Pareto distribution can be estimated, its upper confidence bound cannot be determined and the estimate itself is often unstable with time. Correspondingly, one cannot statistically reject a pure Pareto null hypothesis using natural hazard catalog data. Although physical limits to the hazard source size and attenuation mechanisms from source to site constrain the maximum hazard size, historical data alone often cannot reliably determine the corner size parameter. Probabilistic assessments incorporating theoretical constraints on source size and propagation effects are preferred over deterministic assessments of extreme natural hazards based on historical data.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 595
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is Least-Squares Inaccurate in Fitting Power-Law Distributions? The Criticism is Complete Nonsense
    Zhong, Xiaoshi
    Wang, Muyin
    Zhang, Hongkun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM WEB CONFERENCE 2022 (WWW'22), 2022, : 2748 - 2758
  • [22] Power Law Size Distributions in Geoscience Revisited
    Corral, Alvaro
    Gonzalez, Alvaro
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2019, 6 (05) : 673 - 697
  • [23] Power-law distributions of particle concentration in free-surface flows
    Larkin, Jason
    Bandi, M. M.
    Pumir, Alain
    Goldburg, Walter I.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 80 (06):
  • [24] Deviation of the power-law by geometric aging effect
    Shin, J. K.
    Shin, G. S.
    FRACTALS-COMPLEX GEOMETRY PATTERNS AND SCALING IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2007, 15 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [25] Equilibration of two power-law tailed distributions in a parton cascade model
    Biro, Tamas S.
    Purcsel, Gabor
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2008, 372 (08) : 1174 - 1179
  • [26] Degree distributions under general node removal: Power-law or Poisson?
    Lee, Mi Jin
    Kim, Jung-Ho
    Goh, Kwang-Il
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Son, Seung-Woo
    Lee, Deok-Sun
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2022, 106 (06)
  • [27] Dominance of the suppressed: Power-law size structure in tropical forests
    Farrior, C. E.
    Bohlman, S. A.
    Hubbell, S.
    Pacala, S. W.
    SCIENCE, 2016, 351 (6269) : 155 - 157
  • [28] On the power-law distributions of X-ray fluxes from solar flares observed with GOES
    Li, You-Ping
    Feng, Li
    Zhang, Ping
    Liu, Si-Ming
    Gan, Wei-Qun
    RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2016, 16 (10) : 161 - U106
  • [29] Earthquake size distribution: Power-law with exponent is β ≡ 1/2?
    Kagan, Yan Y.
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2010, 490 (1-2) : 103 - 114