Shipping Fees or Shipping Free? A Tale of Two Price Partitioning Strategies in Online Retailing

被引:68
作者
Guemues, Mehmet [1 ]
Li, Shanling [1 ]
Oh, Wonseok [2 ]
Ray, Saibal [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Desautels Fac Management, Montreal, PQ H3A 1G5, Canada
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Coll Business, Seoul 130722, South Korea
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
retail; E-commerce pricing strategy; price partitioning; free shipping; shipping and handling costs; DISPERSION; COMPETITION; DECISIONS; SHOPBOT; MARKET; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01391.x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this article, we study the price partitioning decisions of online retailers regarding shipping and handling (S&H) fees. Specifically, we analyze two partitioning formats used by retailers in this context. In the first scenario, retailers present customers with a price that is partitioned into a product price and a separate S&H surcharge (the PS strategy); in the second, customers are offered free shipping through a non-partitioned format where the product price already includes the shipping cost (the ZS strategy). We first develop a stylized game-theoretic model that captures the competitive dynamics between (and within) these two formats. Analysis of the model provides insights into how both firm and product level characteristics drive a retailer's strategic choice regarding which partitioning format to adopt and, hence, determines the equilibrium market structure in terms of proportion of ZS and PS retailers. Subsequently, we conduct empirical analyses, based on product and S&H prices data for two different product categories (digital cameras and printers) collected from online retailers, to validate all the results of our theoretical model. We establish that PS retailers charge lower product prices than ZS ones, but the total price (product + S&H) charged is higher for the first group. The S&H charge for PS retailers can be significantit is, on average, 5.4% (printers) and 3.0% (digital cameras) for our two product categories. Furthermore, retailers which are popular and/or face risky cost environment are more likely to opt for the ZS strategy, while retailers whose portfolio mostly includes large or heavy products with high cost (S&H)-to-price ratios usually choose the PS strategy. Lastly, our empirical study also illustrates that the price adjustment behavior of retailers is affected by their shipping-fee policiesfor example, ZS retailers change their product prices almost 1.5 times more frequently than PS ones.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 776
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Anderson C., 2009, FREE FUTURE RADICAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, AM COM ANN REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
[5]   The impact of e-commerce on competition in the retail brokerage industry [J].
Bakos, Y ;
Lucas, HC ;
Oh, W ;
Simon, G ;
Viswanathan, S ;
Weber, BW .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (04) :352-371
[6]  
Barsh Joanna., 2000, MCKIN Q, V3, P98
[7]   Price dispersion in the small and in the large: Evidence from an internet price comparison site [J].
Baye, MR ;
Morgan, J ;
Scholten, P .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 52 (04) :463-496
[8]  
Becerril-Arreola R., 2009, WORKING PAPER
[9]  
BLINDER A, 1998, ASKING PRICES NEW AP
[10]  
Bolotsky D., 2008, ONE RETAILERS VIEW W