Establishing "Normal" Values for Liver Function Tests after Reconstruction of Biliary Injuries

被引:9
作者
Fialkowski, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Winslow, Emily R. [1 ]
Scott, Mitchell G. [2 ]
Hawkins, William G. [1 ]
Linehan, David C. [1 ]
Strasberg, Steven M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol Lab & Genom Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of liver function tests (LFT) are sometimes taken as evidence of a less than optimal result after repair of a biliary injury. Rather than indicating liver or anastomotic dysfunction, moderate LFT elevations can be "normal" for these patients. This study's aim was to determine LFT reference values after biliary-enteric anastomosis for biliary injury repair in persons who have had an excellent postoperative course for > 6 months. STUDY DESIGN: Of 113 patients repaired, 73 were identified with the following characteristics: LFT available at. : 6 months after repair, no biliary tract symptoms, no underlying liver disease, and biliary injury sustained during cholecystectomy. Outside LFT results were standardized to Barnes-Jewish Hospital reference values. One set of LFT per patient was collected at the following times points after repair: 6 months to 2 years, 2 to 5 years, and > 5 years. RESULTS: For each distribution, the 97.5(th) p97.5ercentile values for alkaline phosphatase (>= 166 IU/L) and total bilirubin (>= 1.3 mg/dL) were elevated relative to Barnes-Jewish Hospital standard values. Values for alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase were more variable. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate LFT elevations exceeding standard reference values are common after repair of a biliary injury in patients who have had excellent results. Alkaline phosphatase values fall with time after repair so that comparisons should take into account time from repair. Values <= 97.5(th) percentile limits described here should not be taken as evidence of liver or anastomotic dysfunction. (J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:705-709. (C) 2008 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 709
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Surgical treatment of latrogenic lesions of the proximal common bile duct [J].
Gazzaniga, GM ;
Filauro, M ;
Mori, L .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (10) :1254-1259
[2]   Long-term biliary function after reconstruction of major bile duct injuries with hepaticoduodenostomy or hepaticojejunostomy [J].
Moraca, RJ ;
Lee, FT ;
Ryan, JA ;
Traverso, LW .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (08) :889-893
[3]  
Murr MM, 1999, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V134, P604, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.134.6.604
[4]   Analysis of abnormal recovery pattern of liver function tests after surgical repair of bile duct strictures [J].
Negi, SS ;
Chaudhary, A .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 20 (10) :1533-1537
[5]  
Singh V, 1998, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V45, P1075
[6]  
SOLBERG HE, 2006, TIETZ TXB CLIN CHEM, P425
[7]  
STRASBERG SM, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P101
[8]   The long-term outcome of hepaticojejunostomy in the treatment of benign bile duct strictures [J].
Tocchi, A ;
Costa, G ;
Lepre, L ;
Liotta, G ;
Mazzoni, G ;
Sita, A .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (02) :162-167
[9]  
WINSLOW ER, SIDEWAYS RE IN PRESS