Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy

被引:1
作者
McGowan, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Burnet, N. G. [1 ,2 ]
Lomax, A. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB3 9DQ, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Cambridge, England
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, Villigen, Switzerland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; MOTION COMPENSATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; SCANNING SYSTEM; MOVING TARGETS; HADRON THERAPY; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20120288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of radiotherapy is to achieve uniform target coverage while sparing normal tissue. In proton therapy, the same sources of geometric uncertainty are present as in conventional radiotherapy. However, an important and fundamental difference in proton therapy is that protons have a finite range, highly dependent on the electron density of the material they are traversing, resulting in a steep dose gradient at the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties affecting the proton range is essential for producing plans which are robust to these uncertainties. This review describes the current knowledge of the geometric uncertainties and discusses their impact on proton dose plans. The need for patient-specific validation is essential and in cases of complex intensity-modulated proton therapy plans the use of a planning target volume (PTV) may fail to ensure coverage of the target. In cases where a PTV cannot be used, other methods of quantifying plan quality have been investigated. A promising option is to incorporate uncertainties directly into the optimisation algorithm. A further development is the inclusion of robustness into a multicriteria optimisation framework, allowing a multi-objective Pareto optimisation function to balance robustness and conformity. The question remains as to whether adaptive therapy can become an integral part of a proton therapy, to allow re-optimisation during the course of a patient's treatment. The challenge of ensuring that plans are robust to range uncertainties in proton therapy remains, although these methods can provide practical solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment Planning for Ion Beam Therapy
    Greilich, Steffen
    Jaekel, Oliver
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2009, 1204 : 111 - 115
  • [42] Proton Beam Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Pugh, Thomas J.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (06) : 415 - 420
  • [43] Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas
    Doyen, J.
    Aloi, D.
    Groulier, A.
    Vidal, M.
    Lesueur, P.
    Calugaru, V
    Bondiau, P. Y.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (6-7): : 550 - 553
  • [44] The Use of Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancers
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Rengan, Ramesh
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (06) : 427 - 432
  • [45] Proton therapy for the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer
    Fattahi, Sayeh
    Mullikin, Trey C.
    Aziz, Khaled A.
    Afzal, Arslan
    Smith, Na L.
    Francis, Leah N.
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    Routman, David M.
    Remmes, Nicholas B.
    Ahmed, Safia K.
    Shumway, Dean A.
    Park, Sean S.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 171 : 77 - 83
  • [46] Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc
    Amstutz, Florian
    Krcek, Reinhardt
    Bachtiary, Barbara
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Zhang, Ye
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
  • [47] Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy
    Wei, Shouyi
    Lin, Haibo
    Shi, Chengyu
    Xiong, Weijun
    Chen, Chin-Cheng
    Huang, Sheng
    Press, Robert H.
    Hasan, Shaakir
    Chhabra, Arpit M.
    Choi, J. Isabelle
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Kang, Minglei
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (10) : 6560 - 6574
  • [48] Fraction optimization for hybrid proton-photon treatment planning
    Li, Wangyao
    Zhang, Weijie
    Lin, Yuting
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Gao, Hao
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (06) : 3311 - 3323
  • [49] A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma
    Scobioala, Sergiu
    Kittel, Christopher
    Wissmann, Nicolas
    Haverkamp, Uwe
    Channaoui, Mohammed
    Habibeh, Omar
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Eich, Hans Theodor
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [50] Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning
    Klaassen, Lisa
    Haasjes, Corne
    Hol, Martijn
    Lopes, Patricia Cambraia
    Spruijt, Kees
    van de Steeg-Henzen, Christal
    Vu, Khanh
    Bakker, Pauline
    Rasch, Coen
    Verbist, Berit
    Beenakker, Jan-Willem
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31