Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy

被引:1
作者
McGowan, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Burnet, N. G. [1 ,2 ]
Lomax, A. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB3 9DQ, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Cambridge, England
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, Villigen, Switzerland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; MOTION COMPENSATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; SCANNING SYSTEM; MOVING TARGETS; HADRON THERAPY; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20120288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of radiotherapy is to achieve uniform target coverage while sparing normal tissue. In proton therapy, the same sources of geometric uncertainty are present as in conventional radiotherapy. However, an important and fundamental difference in proton therapy is that protons have a finite range, highly dependent on the electron density of the material they are traversing, resulting in a steep dose gradient at the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties affecting the proton range is essential for producing plans which are robust to these uncertainties. This review describes the current knowledge of the geometric uncertainties and discusses their impact on proton dose plans. The need for patient-specific validation is essential and in cases of complex intensity-modulated proton therapy plans the use of a planning target volume (PTV) may fail to ensure coverage of the target. In cases where a PTV cannot be used, other methods of quantifying plan quality have been investigated. A promising option is to incorporate uncertainties directly into the optimisation algorithm. A further development is the inclusion of robustness into a multicriteria optimisation framework, allowing a multi-objective Pareto optimisation function to balance robustness and conformity. The question remains as to whether adaptive therapy can become an integral part of a proton therapy, to allow re-optimisation during the course of a patient's treatment. The challenge of ensuring that plans are robust to range uncertainties in proton therapy remains, although these methods can provide practical solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Dionisi, Francesco
    Scartoni, Daniele
    Fracchiolla, Francesco
    Giacomelli, Irene
    Siniscalchi, Benedetta
    Goanta, Lucia
    Cianchetti, Marco
    Sanguineti, Giuseppe
    Brolese, Alberto
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [32] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [33] A probability model for anatomical robust optimisation in head and neck cancer proton therapy
    Zhang, Ying
    Alshaikhi, Jailan
    Tan, Wenyong
    Royle, Gary
    Bar, Esther
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (01)
  • [34] Advanced treatment planning using direct 4D optimisation for pencil-beam scanned particle therapy
    Bernatowicz, Kinga
    Zhang, Ye
    Perrin, Rosalind
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (16) : 6595 - 6609
  • [35] Modeling of a Digital Couch for a Proton Treatment Planning System
    Kim, Jin Sung
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    Ahn, Sunghwan
    Shin, Dong Ho
    Lim, Young-Kyung
    Park, Sung Yong
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 55 (04) : 1640 - 1648
  • [36] Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 88 - 96
  • [37] Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning
    Hillbrand, Martin
    Georg, Dietmar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (04): : 93 - 104
  • [38] A treatment planning comparison between proton beam therapy and intensity-modulated x-ray therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Liu, Su-Wen
    Li, Jia-Min
    Chang, Joe-Yujiao
    Yu, Jin-Ming
    Chen, Qing
    Jiang, Qian-An
    Mu, Xiang-Kui
    Zhao, Mei-Hong
    Tian, Ying
    Wei, Qing-Long
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 18 (04) : 443 - 450
  • [39] Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Ocular Melanoma Using a Novel 3D Treatment Planning Technique
    Hartsell, William F.
    Kapur, Rashmi
    Hartsell, Siobhan O'Connor
    Sweeney, Patrick
    Lopes, Caitlin
    Duggal, Amanda
    Cohen, Jack
    Chang, John
    Polasani, Rajeev S.
    Dunn, Megan
    Pankuch, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 353 - 359
  • [40] Clinical modeling and validation of breast tissue expander metallic ports in a commercial treatment planning system for proton therapy
    Kang, Yixiu
    Shen, Jiajian
    Bues, Martin
    Hu, Yanle
    Liu, Wei
    Ding, Xiaoning
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (11) : 7512 - 7525