Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy

被引:1
作者
McGowan, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Burnet, N. G. [1 ,2 ]
Lomax, A. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB3 9DQ, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Cambridge, England
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, Villigen, Switzerland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; MOTION COMPENSATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; SCANNING SYSTEM; MOVING TARGETS; HADRON THERAPY; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20120288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of radiotherapy is to achieve uniform target coverage while sparing normal tissue. In proton therapy, the same sources of geometric uncertainty are present as in conventional radiotherapy. However, an important and fundamental difference in proton therapy is that protons have a finite range, highly dependent on the electron density of the material they are traversing, resulting in a steep dose gradient at the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties affecting the proton range is essential for producing plans which are robust to these uncertainties. This review describes the current knowledge of the geometric uncertainties and discusses their impact on proton dose plans. The need for patient-specific validation is essential and in cases of complex intensity-modulated proton therapy plans the use of a planning target volume (PTV) may fail to ensure coverage of the target. In cases where a PTV cannot be used, other methods of quantifying plan quality have been investigated. A promising option is to incorporate uncertainties directly into the optimisation algorithm. A further development is the inclusion of robustness into a multicriteria optimisation framework, allowing a multi-objective Pareto optimisation function to balance robustness and conformity. The question remains as to whether adaptive therapy can become an integral part of a proton therapy, to allow re-optimisation during the course of a patient's treatment. The challenge of ensuring that plans are robust to range uncertainties in proton therapy remains, although these methods can provide practical solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy
    Zhu, Xiaorong Ronald
    Poenisch, Falk
    Li, Heng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Wu, Richard Y.
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Chang, Eric L.
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Pugh, Thomas
    Frank, Steven J.
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Grosshans, David R.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [22] Advanced treatment planning methods for efficient radiation therapy with laser accelerated proton and ion beams
    Schell, Stefan
    Wilkens, Jan J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (10) : 5330 - 5340
  • [23] Analytical incorporation of fractionation effects in probabilistic treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Wahl, Niklas
    Hennig, Philipp
    Wieser, Hans-Peter
    Bangert, Mark
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1317 - 1328
  • [24] Comprehensive clinical commissioning and validation of the RayStation treatment planning system for proton therapy with active scanning and passive treatment techniques
    Baeumer, C.
    Geismar, D.
    Koska, B.
    Kramer, P. H.
    Lambert, J.
    Lemke, M.
    Plaude, S.
    Pschichholz, L.
    Qamhiyeh, S.
    Schiemann, A.
    Timmermann, B.
    Vermeren, X.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 43 : 15 - 24
  • [25] Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: The impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality
    Zhu, X. R.
    Sahoo, N.
    Zhang, X.
    Robertson, D.
    Li, H.
    Choi, S.
    Lee, A. K.
    Gillin, M. T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (03) : 1210 - 1219
  • [26] Intensity modulated proton therapy for postmastectomy radiation of bilateral implant reconstructed breasts: A treatment planning study
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    Goma, Carles
    Nyamwanda, Jacqueline
    Kooy, Hanne M.
    Halabi, Tarek
    Napolitano, Brian N.
    McBride, Sean M.
    Taghian, Alphonse G.
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    MacDonald, Shannon M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (02) : 213 - 217
  • [27] VARIATIONS IN LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER WITHIN CLINICAL PROTON THERAPY FIELDS AND THE POTENTIAL FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLANNING
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Trofimov, Alexei
    Lomax, Anthony
    Paganetti, Harald
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05): : 1559 - 1566
  • [28] Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity- modulated proton therapy
    An, Yu
    Liang, Jianming
    Schild, Steven E.
    Bues, Martin
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [29] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [30] Improved Beam Angle Arrangement in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Cao, Wenhua
    Lim, Gino J.
    Li, Yupeng
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    CANCERS, 2015, 7 (02): : 574 - 584