Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy

被引:1
|
作者
McGowan, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Burnet, N. G. [1 ,2 ]
Lomax, A. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB3 9DQ, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Cambridge, England
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, Villigen, Switzerland
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2013年 / 86卷 / 1021期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; MOTION COMPENSATION; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; SCANNING SYSTEM; MOVING TARGETS; HADRON THERAPY; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20120288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of radiotherapy is to achieve uniform target coverage while sparing normal tissue. In proton therapy, the same sources of geometric uncertainty are present as in conventional radiotherapy. However, an important and fundamental difference in proton therapy is that protons have a finite range, highly dependent on the electron density of the material they are traversing, resulting in a steep dose gradient at the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties affecting the proton range is essential for producing plans which are robust to these uncertainties. This review describes the current knowledge of the geometric uncertainties and discusses their impact on proton dose plans. The need for patient-specific validation is essential and in cases of complex intensity-modulated proton therapy plans the use of a planning target volume (PTV) may fail to ensure coverage of the target. In cases where a PTV cannot be used, other methods of quantifying plan quality have been investigated. A promising option is to incorporate uncertainties directly into the optimisation algorithm. A further development is the inclusion of robustness into a multicriteria optimisation framework, allowing a multi-objective Pareto optimisation function to balance robustness and conformity. The question remains as to whether adaptive therapy can become an integral part of a proton therapy, to allow re-optimisation during the course of a patient's treatment. The challenge of ensuring that plans are robust to range uncertainties in proton therapy remains, although these methods can provide practical solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment planning in proton therapy
    Schwarz, M.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2011, 126 (07): : 1 - 10
  • [2] Daily Head and Neck Treatment Assessment for Optimal Proton Therapy Planning Robustness
    Chang, Leslie
    Shaaban, Sherif G.
    Gogineni, Emile
    Page, Brandi
    Quon, Harry
    Li, Heng
    Ger, Rachel
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [3] New guidelines and recommendations to advance treatment planning in proton therapy
    Knaeusl, Barbara
    Vestergaard, Anne
    Schwarz, Marco
    Muren, Ludvig P.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [4] Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy
    Ramos-Mendez, Jose
    Burigo, Lucas N.
    Schulte, Reinhard
    Chuang, Cynthia
    Faddegon, Bruce
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (23):
  • [5] Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?
    Nystrom, Hakan
    Jensen, Maria Fuglsang
    Nystrom, Petra Witt
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107):
  • [6] Study on Treatment Planning for the Prostate in Proton Therapy with Oxygen Enhancement Ratio Effect
    Yoo, Seung Hoon
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Kong, Chi Wah
    Yang, Bin
    Chiu, Tin Lok
    Wu, Po Man
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    Shin, Dongho
    Min, Byung Jun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 77 (07) : 613 - 623
  • [7] Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Malignancies of the Base of Skull: Treatment Planning, Acute Toxicities, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes
    Grosshans, David R.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Melancon, Adam
    Allen, Pamela K.
    Poenisch, Falk
    Palmer, Matthew
    McAleer, Mary Frances
    McGovern, Susan L.
    Gillin, Michael
    DeMonte, Franco
    Chang, Eric L.
    Brown, Paul D.
    Mahajan, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (03): : 540 - 546
  • [8] A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Fuji, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Yuichi
    Pu, Yuehu
    Tsukishima, Chihiro
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [9] A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Seki, Kazuya
    Kogame, Shouki
    Tanaka, Sodai
    Kanehira, Takahiro
    Tamura, Masaya
    Takao, Seishin
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Kobashi, Keiji
    Kato, Fumi
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 : 23 - 29
  • [10] Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: Comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma
    Harding, R.
    Trnkova, P.
    Weston, S. J.
    Lilley, J.
    Thompson, C. M.
    Short, S. C.
    Loughrey, C.
    Cosgrove, V. P.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Thwaites, D. I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (11)