A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics

被引:29
作者
Chen, Chun-Yu [1 ]
Wu, Yen-Chun Jim [2 ]
Wu, Wen-Hsiung [3 ]
机构
[1] Meiho Univ, Pingtung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Business Management Dept, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Dept Healthcare Adm & Med Informat, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Business education; Knowledge creation; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Management research; Learning; Research; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; RELEVANCE GAP; ORGANIZATION; KNOWLEDGE; CREATION; DIVIDE; FUTURE; RIGOR;
D O I
10.1108/00251741311309661
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the co-production of knowledge and dialogic relationships via the collaboration between business practitioners and academic researchers. Design/methodology/approach - The motivations, expectations, communication processes, and final performance of those engaged in collaborative management research are explored by applying a two-pronged methodology with a content analysis and an e-mail survey. The authors conducted a content analysis on 136 articles identified out of a total of 2,029 articles from six leading journals during 2006-2011 which fulfilled the criteria of being coauthored by both professors and practitioners. An e-mail survey of six open questions was given to pre-screened authors in the first stage to investigate the in-depth dialogue processes and stories of these collaborations. Findings - The results revealed that collaboration topics of interest focused mostly on organizational behavior, business policy, and strategy, and that theoretical inquiry and case study were the most used research methods. According to the 68 valid returned e-mail surveys, the providing of consulting services by professors in firms plays a critical role in facilitating knowledge co-creation between practice and knowing. The findings also highlight key factors of sustainable co-production relationships. Originality/value - This study provides an empirical, valuable step towards an investigation into the co-creation dialogue experiences of practitioners and academics in three dimensions: purpose, procedure, and promise.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 593
页数:28
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Strat. Leader., DOI [DOI 10.1108/10878570410699249, 10.1108/10878570410699249]
[2]   Impact and Scholarship: Unlearning and Practising to Co-create Actionable Knowledge [J].
Antonacopoulou, Elena P. .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2009, 40 (04) :421-430
[3]   Action research [J].
Avison, D ;
Lau, F ;
Myers, M ;
Nielsen, PA .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1999, 42 (01) :94-97
[4]   Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters [J].
Beech, Nic ;
MacIntosh, Robert ;
MacLean, Donald .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2010, 31 (9-10) :1341-1367
[5]  
Bennis WG, 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V83, P96
[7]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[8]  
D'Andrea G, 2010, HARVARD BUS REV, V88, P115
[9]   A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics [J].
David, RJ ;
Han, SK .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) :39-58
[10]   A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies - Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements [J].
Duriau, Vincent J. ;
Reger, Rhonda K. ;
Pfarrer, Michael D. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 10 (01) :5-34