Loneliness in Primary Care Patients: A Prevalence Study

被引:70
作者
Mullen, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Tong, Sebastian [2 ]
Sabo, Roy T. [2 ,3 ]
Liaw, Winston R. [4 ,5 ]
Marshall, John [2 ]
Nease, Donald E., Jr. [4 ]
Krist, Alex H. [2 ]
Frey, John J., III [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Heath Sci, Houston, TX USA
[5] Robert Graham Ctr Policy Studies Family Med & Pri, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
关键词
loneliness; 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale; primary care; prevalence; SOCIAL-ISOLATION; OLDER-PEOPLE; RISK-FACTORS; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; PREDICTOR; MORTALITY; EMERGENCY; ADULTS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1370/afm.2358
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Loneliness has important health consequences. Little is known, however, about loneliness in primary care patient populations. This study describes the prevalence of loneliness in patients presenting for primary care and associations with self-reported demographic factors, health care utilization, and health-related quality of life. METHODS We conducted cross-sectional surveys of adults presenting for routine care to outpatient primary care practices in 2 diverse practice-based research networks. The 3-item University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale was utilized to determine loneliness. RESULTS The prevalence of loneliness was 20% (246/1,235). Loneliness prevalence was inversely associated with age (P <.01) and less likely in those who were married (P <.01) or employed (P <.01). Loneliness was more common in those with lower health status (P <.01), including when adjusting for employment and relationship status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07). Primary care visits (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10), urgent care/emergency department visits (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.38), and hospitalizations (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31) were associated with loneliness status. There was no significant difference in rates of loneliness between sexes (P = .08), racial categories (P = .57), or rural and urban respondents (P = .42). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that loneliness is common in primary care patients and is associated with adverse health consequences including poorer health status and greater health care utilization. Further work is needed to understand the value of screening for and using interventions to treat loneliness in primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 115
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, CAPT SOC BEH DOM MEA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Measuring healthy days
  • [3] Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health
    Beutel, Manfred E.
    Klein, Eva M.
    Braehler, Elmar
    Reiner, Iris
    Juenger, Claus
    Michal, Matthias
    Wiltink, Joerg
    Wild, Philipp S.
    Muenzel, Thomas
    Lackner, Karl J.
    Tibubos, Ana N.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [4] BRAGE D, 1993, ADOLESCENCE, V28, P685
  • [5] The phenotype of loneliness
    Cacioppo, John T.
    Cacioppo, Stephanie
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 9 (04) : 446 - 452
  • [6] Perceived Social Isolation Makes Me Sad: 5-Year Cross-Lagged Analyses of Loneliness and Depressive Symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study
    Cacioppo, John T.
    Hawkley, Louise C.
    Thisted, Ronald A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (02) : 453 - 463
  • [7] Perceived social isolation and cognition
    Cacioppo, John T.
    Hawkey, Louise C.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (10) : 447 - 454
  • [8] Loneliness: Clinical Import and Interventions
    Cacioppo, Stephanie
    Grippo, Angela J.
    London, Sarah
    Goossens, Luc
    Cacioppo, John T.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (02) : 238 - 249
  • [9] The effect of telephone social support and education on adaptation to breast cancer during the year following diagnosis
    Coleman, EA
    Tulman, L
    Samarel, N
    Wilmoth, MC
    Rickel, L
    Rickel, M
    Stewart, CB
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2005, 32 (04) : 822 - 829
  • [10] DeVries MJ, 1997, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V6, P129, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199706)6:2<129::AID-PON264>3.3.CO