Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

被引:16
|
作者
Katajapuu, Niina [1 ,2 ]
Heinonen, Ari [1 ]
Saltychev, Mikhail [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sports & Hlth Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Wellbeing, Turku, Finland
[3] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
关键词
Whodas; minimal clinically important difference; minimal detectable change; musculoskeletal pain; 12-ITEM; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0269215520942573
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study is to estimate a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Setting: Outpatient Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine clinic. Subjects: A total of 1988 consecutive patients with musculoskeletal pain. Interventions: A distribution-based approach was employed to estimate a minimal clinically important difference, a minimal detectable change, and a minimal detectable percent change (MDC%). Results: The mean age of the patients was 48 years, and 65% were women. The average intensity of pain was 6,3 (2.0) points (0-10 numeric rating scale) and the mean WHODAS 2.0 total score was 13 (9) points out of 48. The minimal clinically important difference ranged between 3.1 and 4.7 points. The minimal detectable change was 8.6 points and minimal detectable % change was unacceptably high 66%. Conclusions: Amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated a high minimal detectable change of almost nine points. As the minimal detectable change exceeded the level of minimal clinically important difference, nine points were considered to be the amount of change perceived by a respondent as clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1511
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Wong, Jessica J.
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    De Groote, Wouter
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montse
    Acuna, angels Pont
    Cote, Pierre
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [2] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Jessica J. Wong
    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
    Wouter De Groote
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Olatz Garin
    Montse Ferrer
    Àngels Pont Acuña
    Pierre Côté
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 31
  • [3] The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients
    Higgins, Alisa M.
    Neto, Ary Serpa
    Bailey, Michael
    Barrett, Jonathan
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Cooper, D. James
    Gabbe, Belinda
    Linke, Natalie
    Myles, Paul S.
    Paton, Michelle
    Philpot, Steve
    Shulman, Mark
    Young, Meredith
    Hodgson, Carol L.
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2021, 23 (01) : 103 - +
  • [4] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
    Wawrzyniak, Kelly M.
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Kulich, Ronald J.
    Weed, Valerie F.
    Myrta, Eura
    DiBenedetto, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1855 - 1862
  • [5] Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Wong, Jessica J.
    DeSouza, Astrid
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    De Groote, Wouter
    Southerst, Danielle
    Belchos, Melissa
    Lemeunier, Nadege
    Alexopulos, Stephanie
    Varmazyar, Hamid
    Mior, Silvano A.
    Stern, Paula J.
    Nordin, Margareta C.
    Taylor-Vaisey, Anne
    Cieza, Alarcos
    Cote, Pierre
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (02): : 287 - 301
  • [6] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [7] Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Hu, Chaur-Jong
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (47) : e2155
  • [8] Floor and ceiling effects of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Laimi, Katri
    Heinonen, Ari
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (02) : 190 - 192
  • [9] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):
  • [10] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,