Choosing a Committee Under Majority Voting

被引:0
作者
Aslan, Fatma [1 ,2 ]
Dindar, Hayrullah [2 ]
Laine, Jean [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] LIRSA, CNAM, Paris, France
[2] Istanbul Bilgi Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Murat Sertel Ctr Adv Econ Studies, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION: BEHAVIOR, MODELS, AND SUPPORT, GDN 2019 | 2019年 / 351卷
关键词
Committee election; Voting paradoxes; Majority voting; Separable preferences; OSTROGORSKI PARADOX; THEOREM;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-21711-2_3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the elections of a seat-posted committee, and investigate the propensity of seat-wise majority voting to choose a committee that fulfills the majority will with respect to preferences over committees. Voters have seat-wise preferences and preferences over committees are derived from seat-wise preferences by means of a neutral preference extension. Neutrality means that the names of candidates do not play any role. The majority committee paradox refers to a situation where a Condorcet winner exists for each seat, and a Condorcet winner committee also exists but does not coincide with the combination of seat-wise Condorcet winners. The majority committee weak paradox refers to a situation where the combination of seat-wise Condorcet winners is not a Condorcet winner among committees. We characterize the domains of preference extensions immune to each of the paradoxes.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 42
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Majority voting for discrete population-based optimization algorithms
    Sedigheh Mahdavi
    Shahryar Rahnamayan
    Abbas Mahdavi
    Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 1 - 18
  • [42] Theoretical bounds of majority voting performance for a binary classification problem
    Narasimhamurthy, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 27 (12) : 1988 - 1995
  • [44] Unconstrained Handwritten Numeral Recognition Using Majority Voting Classifier
    Kumar, Rajiv
    Ahmed, Pervez
    Goyal, Mayank Kumar
    Kumar, Amresh
    2012 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (PDGC), 2012, : 284 - 289
  • [45] Majority voting for discrete population-based optimization algorithms
    Mahdavi, Sedigheh
    Rahnamayan, Shahryar
    Mahdavi, Abbas
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [46] Framework for the future? Exploring the possibility of majority voting in the climate negotiations
    Luke Kemp
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2016, 16 : 757 - 779
  • [47] Action Recognition using Transfer Learning and Majority Voting for CSGO
    Apon, Tasnim Sakib
    Islam, Abrar
    Alam, Md Golam Rabiul
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEM (ICTS), 2021, : 235 - 240
  • [48] Outlier detection for scanned point clouds using majority voting
    Wang, Yutao
    Feng, Hsi-Yung
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2015, 62 : 31 - 43
  • [49] Majority Voting and Feature Selection Based Network Intrusion Detection System
    Patil, Dharmaraj R.
    Pattewar, Tareek M.
    EAI ENDORSED TRANSACTIONS ON SCALABLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (06):
  • [50] Does the director election system matter? Evidence from majority voting
    Ertimur, Yonca
    Ferri, Fabrizio
    Oesch, David
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2015, 20 (01) : 1 - 41