How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance?

被引:217
作者
Delgado, Felipe [1 ]
Carlos Munoz, Juan [1 ]
Giesen, Ricardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Transport Engn & Logist, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Bus bunching; Transit operations; Real-time control; Holding; Boarding limits; REAL-TIME INFORMATION; MODEL; OPERATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2012.04.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Bus bunching affects transit operations by increasing passenger waiting times and its variability. This work proposes a new mathematical programming model to control vehicles operating on a transit corridor minimizing total delays. The model can handle a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles with different capacities without using binary variables, which make solution times compatible with real-time requirements. Two control policies are studied within a rolling horizon framework: (i) vehicle holding (HRT), which can be applied at any stop and (ii) holding combined with boarding limits (HBLRT), in which the number of boarding passengers at any stop can be limited in order to increase operational speed. Both strategies are evaluated in a simulation environment under different operational conditions. The results show that HBLRT and HRT outperform other benchmark control strategies in all scenarios, with savings of excess waiting time of up to 77% and very low variability in performance. HBLRT shows significant benefits in relation to HRT only under short headway operation and high passenger demand. Moreover, our results suggest implementing boarding limits only when the next arriving vehicle is nearby. Interestingly, in these cases HBLRT not only reduces an extra 6.3% the expected waiting time in comparison with HRT, but also outperforms other control schemes in terms of comfort and reliability to both passengers and operators. To passengers HBLRT provide a more balanced load factor across vehicles yielding a more comfortable experience. To operators the use of boarding limits speed up vehicles reducing the average cycle time and its variability, which is key for a smooth operation at terminals. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1217
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Barnett A., 1974, Transportation Science, V8, P102, DOI 10.1287/trsc.8.2.102
  • [2] A self-coordinating bus route to resist bus bunching
    Bartholdi, John J., III
    Eisenstein, Donald D.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2012, 46 (04) : 481 - 491
  • [3] Boardman A.E., 2001, COST BENEFIT ANAL
  • [4] Ceder A, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, P3
  • [5] Hybrid predictive control for real-time optimization of public transport systems' operations based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Cortes, Cristian E.
    Saez, Doris
    Milla, Freddy
    Nunez, Alfredo
    Riquelme, Marcela
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 18 (05) : 757 - 769
  • [6] Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation
    Daganzo, Carlos F.
    Pilachowski, Josh
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (01) : 267 - 277
  • [7] A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons
    Daganzo, Carlos F.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2009, 43 (10) : 913 - 921
  • [8] Real-Time Control of Buses in a Transit Corridor Based on Vehicle Holding and Boarding Limits
    Delgado, Felipe
    Carlos Munoz, Juan
    Giesen, Ricardo
    Cipriano, Aldo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2090) : 59 - 67
  • [9] Ding Y, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, P161
  • [10] Eberlein X. J., 1995, OPTIMAL FIBER YIELD