Solar energy generation in three dimensions

被引:59
作者
Bernardi, Marco [1 ]
Ferralis, Nicola [1 ]
Wan, Jin H. [2 ]
Villalon, Rachelle [3 ]
Grossman, Jeffrey C. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Dept Architecture, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Solar power generation - Solar absorbers - Solar panels;
D O I
10.1039/c2ee21170j
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We formulate, solve computationally and study experimentally the problem of collecting solar energy in three dimensions. We demonstrate that absorbers and reflectors can be combined in the absence of sun tracking to build three-dimensional photovoltaic (3DPV) structures that can generate measured energy densities (energy per base area, kWh/m(2)) higher by a factor of 2-20 than stationary flat PV panels for the structures considered here, compared to an increase by a factor of 1.3-1.8 for a flat panel with dual-axis sun tracking. The increased energy density is countered by a larger solar cell area per generated energy for 3DPV compared to flat panels (by a factor of 1.5-4 in our conditions), but accompanied by a vast range of improvements. 3DPV structures can mitigate some of the variability inherent to solar PV as they provide a more even source of solar energy generation at all latitudes: they can double the number of peak power generation hours and dramatically reduce the seasonal, latitude and weather variations of solar energy generation compared to a flat panel design. Self-supporting 3D shapes can create new schemes for PV installation and the increased energy density can facilitate the use of cheaper thin film materials in area-limited applications. Our findings suggest that harnessing solar energy in three dimensions can open new avenues towards Terawatt-scale generation.
引用
收藏
页码:6880 / 6884
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Complex Adaptive Systems
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Classical Electrodynamics
[3]  
Barbose G., 2010, LBNL4121E
[4]   Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement [J].
Blankenship, Robert E. ;
Tiede, David M. ;
Barber, James ;
Brudvig, Gary W. ;
Fleming, Graham ;
Ghirardi, Maria ;
Gunner, M. R. ;
Junge, Wolfgang ;
Kramer, David M. ;
Melis, Anastasios ;
Moore, Thomas A. ;
Moser, Christopher C. ;
Nocera, Daniel G. ;
Nozik, Arthur J. ;
Ort, Donald R. ;
Parson, William W. ;
Prince, Roger C. ;
Sayre, Richard T. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6031) :805-809
[5]   Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics [J].
Darling, Seth B. ;
You, Fengqi ;
Veselka, Thomas ;
Velosa, Alfonso .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (09) :3133-3139
[6]   Solar energy conversion toward 1 terawatt [J].
Ginley, David ;
Green, Martin A. ;
Collins, Reuben .
MRS BULLETIN, 2008, 33 (04) :355-364
[7]   Optimizing luminescent solar concentrator design [J].
Hernandez-Noyola, Hermilo ;
Potterveld, David H. ;
Holt, Roy J. ;
Darling, Seth B. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (02) :5798-5802
[8]  
Kumara S., SINGLE MULTIOBJECTIV
[9]   Optimum fixed orientations and benefits of tracking for capturing solar radiation in the continental United States [J].
Lave, Matthew ;
Kleissl, Jan .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (03) :1145-1152
[10]   Another pathway to large-scale power generation: Concentrating solar power [J].
Mehos, Mark .
MRS BULLETIN, 2008, 33 (04) :364-366