Efficacy of natural wetlands to retain nutrient, sediment and microbial pollutants

被引:76
作者
Knox, A. K. [1 ]
Dahgren, R. A. [1 ]
Tate, K. W. [2 ]
Atwill, E. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2007.0067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wetlands can improve water quality through natural processes including sedimentation, nutrient transformations, and microbial and plant uptake. Tailwater from irrigated pastures may contribute to nonpoint source water Pollution in the form of sediments, nutrients, and pathogens that degrade downstream water quality. We examined benefits to water quality provided by a natural, flow-through wetland and a degraded, channelized wetland situated within the flood-irrigation agricultural landscape of the Sierra Nevada foothills of Northern California. The non-degraded, reference wetland significantly improved water quality by reducing loads of total suspended sediments, nitrate, and Escherichia coli on average by 77, 60, and 68%, respectively. Retention of total N, total P, and soluble reactive P (SRP) was between 35 and 42% of loads entering the reference wetland. Retention of pollutant leads by the channelized wetland was significantly lower than by the reference wetland for all pollutants except SRP. A net export of sediment and nitrate was observed from the channelized wetland. Decreased irrigation inflow rates significantly improved retention efficiencies for nitrate, E, coli, and sediments in the reference wetland. We suggest that maintenance of these natural wetlands and regulation of inflow rates can be important aspects of a best management plan to improve water quality as water runs off of irrigated pastures.
引用
收藏
页码:1837 / 1846
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BUFFER ZONES THEIR P
[2]   Efficacy of natural grassland buffers for removal of Cryptosporidium parvum in rangeland runoff [J].
Atwill, ER ;
Tate, KW ;
Pereira, MDC ;
Bartolome, J ;
Nader, G .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2006, 69 (01) :177-184
[3]   MODELING FECAL-COLIFORM BACTERIA .1. FIELD AND LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF LOSS KINETICS [J].
AUER, MT ;
NIEHAUS, SL .
WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (04) :693-701
[4]   Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria [J].
Bai, S ;
Lung, WS .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (20) :5232-5240
[5]  
Blahnik T, 2000, WETLANDS, V20, P48, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0048:TEOVHA]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[8]   Overland flow delivery of faecal bacteria to a headwater pastoral stream [J].
Collins, R ;
Elliott, S ;
Adams, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (01) :126-132
[10]  
COOKE JG, 1990, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V14, P37