Comparison of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated Classification of Focal and Non-Focal Epileptic EEG Signals

被引:36
作者
Jukic, Samed [1 ]
Saracevic, Muzafer [2 ]
Subasi, Abdulhamit [3 ]
Kevric, Jasmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Burch Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Francuske Revolucije Bb, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] Univ Novi Pazar, Dept Comp Sci, Dimitrija Tucovica Bb, Novi Pazar 36300, Serbia
[3] Effat Univ, Coll Engn, Jeddah 21478, Saudi Arabia
关键词
electroencephalogram (EEG); source localization; multi-scale principal component analysis; autoregressive (AR) method; ensemble machine learning methods; RANDOM SUBSPACE METHOD; LOCALIZATION; FOREST; EMD; DWT;
D O I
10.3390/math8091481
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This research presents the epileptic focus region localization during epileptic seizures by applying different signal processing and ensemble machine learning techniques in intracranial recordings of electroencephalogram (EEG). Multi-scale Principal Component Analysis (MSPCA) is used for denoising EEG signals and the autoregressive (AR) algorithm will extract useful features from the EEG signal. The performances of the ensemble machine learning methods are measured with accuracy, F-measure, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). EEG-based focus area localization with the proposed methods reaches 98.9% accuracy using the Rotation Forest classifier. Therefore, our results suggest that ensemble machine learning methods can be applied to differentiate the EEG signals from epileptogenic brain areas and signals recorded from non-epileptogenic brain regions with high accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform
    Adeli, H
    Zhou, Z
    Dadmehr, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2003, 123 (01) : 69 - 87
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, Data Mining: Introductory and Advanced Topics
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, SE EUR J SOFT COMPUT, DOI DOI 10.21533/SCJOURNAL.V4I1.90
  • [4] Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring
    Bakshi, BR
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (07) : 1596 - 1610
  • [5] An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants
    Bauer, E
    Kohavi, R
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) : 105 - 139
  • [6] A novel approach for automated detection of focal EEG signals using empirical wavelet transform
    Bhattacharyya, Abhijit
    Sharma, Manish
    Pachori, Ram Bilas
    Sircar, Pradip
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2018, 29 (08) : 47 - 57
  • [7] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [8] Browne M., 2006, LECT NOTES DATA MINI
  • [9] Cohen A., 2000, BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS O, V2nd
  • [10] Quantification and localization of EEG interictal spike activity in patients with surgically removed epileptogenic foci
    Coutin-Churchman, Pedro E.
    Wu, Joyce Y.
    Chen, Leo L. K.
    Shattuck, Kirk
    Dewar, Sandy
    Nuwer, Marc R.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (03) : 471 - 485