EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ABUTMENT MATERIALS ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN PERIPHERAL BONE AND DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM

被引:0
作者
Terzi, Merve [1 ]
Guvercin, Yilmaz [2 ]
Ates, Sabit Melih [3 ]
Sekban, Dursun Murat [4 ]
Yaylaci, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Rize, Turkey
[2] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Rize, Turkey
[3] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Dept Prosthet Dent, Rize, Turkey
[4] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Marine Engn Operat, Trabzon, Turkey
来源
SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2020年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Biomechanics; dental implant; finite element method; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; PROSTHESIS; TITANIUM; NUMBER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, the effect of different abutment materials on the stress distribution in bone tissue around the dental implant was investigated using ANSYS packet program based on finite element method. The study aims to examine the stresses, strains and deformations that will occur in the bone, dental implants and abutments with the replacement of abutment materials on the titanium dental implant. Modeling has been prepared in Solidworks program. Titanium was chosen as the dental implant material. Abutment materials were selected as titanium, zirconium, chrome-cobalt and polyetheretherketone. After modeling, necessary load was applied to the abutments and analyzed. This process was repeated for each abutment material. As a result of the analyzes, the stresses, strains and deformations that occurred in the bone, dental implants and abutments were combined into tables. In the conclusion, the differences between the abutment materials were evaluated. Generally, it was found that the lowest values were obtained in the group that chrome-cobalt was used as an abutment material. Therefore, chrome-cobalt can be preferred as an abutment material among all tested materials.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1507
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Aksan M.E., 2018, ATATURK U DIS HEKIML, V28, P91
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ANSYS 16 0
[3]  
Callister W.D., 2013, Material Science and Engineering, V9th
[4]  
Colling E.W., 1984, PHYS METALLURGY TITA, P65
[5]  
Damlar I., 2014, SULEYMAN DEMIREL U M, V2, P175
[6]   Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla [J].
de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (06) :663-670
[7]   Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis [J].
Deste, G. ;
Durkan, R. .
NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (04) :456-463
[8]  
Djebbar N., 2018, J BIOMIMETICS BIOMAT, V31, P44
[9]  
ELIAS DM, 2020, FUNDAMENTAL RES, V33, P81, DOI DOI 10.11607/IJP.6247
[10]  
Fish J., 2007, 1 COURSE FINITE ELEM, P15