Public Opinion, Policy Tools, and the Status Quo: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

被引:33
作者
Haselswerdt, Jake [1 ,2 ]
Bartels, Brandon L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC USA
关键词
submerged state; public opinion; public policy; tax expenditures; policy tools; SOCIAL-POLICY; ATTITUDES; REFORM;
D O I
10.1177/1065912915591217
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The method in which a government policy is deliveredfor example, as a tax break rather than a direct paymentcould potentially have significant implications for how the public views that policy. This is an especially important consideration given the importance of indirect policy approaches like tax breaks to modern American governance. We employ a series of survey experiments to test whether citizens react more favorably to tax breaks than to equivalent spending programs. We find that citizens prefer tax breaks, particularly when they are the established means of intervention. When direct intervention is the status quo, or when any government involvement on the issue is unfamiliar, the preference is reduced. We also find an interactive effect for ideology, with conservatives strongly preferring tax breaks to direct intervention, though the effect is still present among liberals. This study establishes the importance of delivery mechanism to citizens' policy preferences and suggests that the policy status quo structures citizens' perceptions of policy proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 621
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条