Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition

被引:47
作者
Koch, I [1 ]
Philipp, AM [1 ]
Gade, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01709.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a study of the formation of representations of task sequences and its influence on task inhibition, participants first performed tasks in a predictable sequence (e.g., ABACBC) and then performed the tasks in a random sequence. Half of the participants were explicitly instructed about the predictable sequence, whereas the other participants did not receive these instructions. Task-sequence learning was inferred from shorter reaction times (RTs) in predictable relative to random sequences. Persisting inhibition of competing tasks was indicated by increased RTs in n- 2 task repetitions (e.g., ABA) compared with n- 2 nonrepetitions (e.g., CBA). The results show task-sequence learning for both groups. However, task inhibition was reduced in predictable relative to random sequences among instructed-learning participants who formed an explicit representation of the task sequence, whereas sequence learning and task inhibition were independent in the noninstructed group. We hypothesize that the explicit instructions led to chunking of the task sequence, and that n- 2 repetitions served as chunk points (ABA-CBC), so that within-chunk facilitation modulated the inhibition effect.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 350
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   LEARNING THE STRUCTURE OF EVENT SEQUENCES [J].
CLEEREMANS, A ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1991, 120 (03) :235-253
[2]  
Curran T, 2001, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V40, P147
[3]   Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold [J].
Dienes, Z ;
Berry, D .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (01) :3-23
[4]   Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning [J].
Gotler, A ;
Meiran, N ;
Tzelgov, J .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) :890-896
[5]   Implicit learning of sequences of tasks [J].
Heuer, H ;
Schmidtke, V ;
Kleinsorge, T .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (04) :967-983
[6]   Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action [J].
Houghton, G ;
Tipper, SP .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1996, 30 (01) :20-43
[7]   The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation [J].
Keele, SW ;
Ivry, R ;
Mayr, U ;
Hazeltine, E ;
Heuer, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :316-339
[8]   Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks [J].
Koch, I ;
Hoffmann, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2000, 63 (01) :22-35
[9]   Automatic and intentional activation of task sets [J].
Koch, I .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (06) :1474-1486
[10]   Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit [J].
Lien, MC ;
Ruthruff, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (03) :697-713