Application of electrostatic separation and differential scanning calorimetry for microplastic analysis in river sediments

被引:6
作者
Kurzweg, Lucas [1 ]
Schirrmeister, Sven [1 ]
Hauffe, Maurice [1 ]
Adomat, Yasmin [2 ]
Socher, Martin [1 ]
Harre, Kathrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Dresden, Fac Agr Environm & Chem, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Dresden, Fac Civil Engn, Dresden, Germany
关键词
microplastic; monitoring; sediment; electrostatic separation; DSC; recovery; differential scanning calorimetry; ENVIRONMENT; WATER; OIL;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.1032005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A method with the potential for comprehensive microplastic monitoring in river sediments is presented in this study. We introduce a novel combination of electrostatic separation, density separation, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Currently, microplastic analysis in sediments is limited in terms of sample masses, processing time, and analytical robustness. This work evaluated a method to process large sample masses efficiently and still obtain robust results. Four particulate matrices, including commercial sands and river sediments, were spiked with PCL, LD-PE, and PET microplastic particles (63-200 mu m). Samples with a mass of 100 g and 1,000 g (sand only) contained 75 mg of each microplastic. After electrostatic separation, the mass of sand samples was reduced by 98%. Sediment samples showed a mass reduction of 70-78%. After density separation, the total mass reduction of sediment samples was above 99%. The increased concentration of total organic carbon seems to have the highest impact on mass reduction by electrostatic separation. Nevertheless, the recovery of microplastic was independent of the particulate matrix and was polymer-specific. In 100 g samples, the average recovery rates for PCL, LD-PE, and PET were 74 & PLUSMN; 9%, 93 & PLUSMN; 9%, and 120 & PLUSMN; 18%, respectively. The recoveries of microplastic from 1,000 g samples were 50 & PLUSMN; 8%, 114 & PLUSMN; 9%, and 82 & PLUSMN; 11%, respectively. In scale up experiments, high recoveries of all microplastics were observed with a decrease in standard deviation. Moreover, the biodegradable polymer PCL could be used as an internal standard to provide quality assurance of the process. This method can overcome the current limitations of routine microplastic analysis in particulate matrices. We conclude that this method can be applied for comprehensive microplastic monitoring in highly polluted sediments. More studies on electrostatic separation and polymer-specific recovery rates in complex matrices are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [11] Corona Separation of Fly Ash
    Das, Subhankar
    Koehnlechner, Rainer
    Aman, Florian
    Dascalescu, Lucian
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2010, 46 (06) : 2157 - 2164
  • [12] Demirel B., 2011, BALIKESIR UNIV BILIM, V13, P26
  • [13] Evaluation of Electrostatic Separation of Microplastics From Mineral-Rich Environmental Samples
    Enders, Kristina
    Tagg, Alexander S.
    Labrenz, Matthias
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [14] When every particle matters: A QuEChERS approach to extract microplastics from environmental samples
    Enders, Kristina
    Lenz, Robin
    do Sul, Juliana A. Ivar
    Tagg, Alexander S.
    Labrenz, Matthias
    [J]. METHODSX, 2020, 7
  • [15] New plastic formations in the Anthropocene
    Enrique De-la-Torre, Gabriel
    Carolina Dioses-Salinas, Diana
    Ivan Pizarro-Ortega, Carlos
    Santillan, Luis
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 754
  • [16] Biofilm growth on cohesive sediment deposits: laboratory experiment and model validation
    Fang, Hongwei
    Chen, Yishan
    Huang, Lei
    He, Guojian
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2017, 799 (01) : 261 - 274
  • [17] A new approach in separating microplastics from environmental samples based on their electrostatic behavior
    Felsing, Stefanie
    Kochleus, Christian
    Buchinger, Sebastian
    Brennholt, Nicole
    Stock, Friederike
    Reifferscheid, Georg
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 234 : 20 - 28
  • [18] The biofilm matrix
    Flemming, Hans-Curt
    Wingender, Jost
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 8 (09) : 623 - 633
  • [19] Gehringer S., 2021, DISSERTATION
  • [20] A review of analytical techniques for quantifying microplastics in sediments
    Hanvey, Joanne S.
    Lewis, Phoebe J.
    Lavers, Jennifer L.
    Crosbie, Nicholas D.
    Pozo, Karla
    Clarke, Bradley O.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2017, 9 (09) : 1369 - 1383