Job satisfaction and self-selection into the public or private sector: Evidence from a natural experiment

被引:10
作者
Danzer, Natalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Boltzrnannstr 20, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Public sector; Job satisfaction; Self-selection; Quasi-experiment; Privatization; Fringe benefits; Emerging economies; LIFE SATISFACTION; PRIVATIZATION; INEQUALITY; EMPLOYMENT; WORKERS; RUSSIA; IDENTIFICATION; PRIVATISATION; DETERMINANTS; UNEMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.labeco.2019.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Are public sector jobs better than private sector jobs? To answer this question, this paper investigates observed differences in job satisfaction between public- and private-sector workers and disentangles the effect of worker sorting from the one caused by sector-specific job characteristics. A natural experiment the massive privatization process in post-Soviet countries allows correcting potential self-selection bias in a unique and nationally representative Ukrainian survey for the years 2003 to 2007. Unanticipated industry-specific privatization probabilities are assigned to workers based on retrospective information on their personal jobs held during Soviet times well in advance of the onset of the privatization process and the emergence of a private sector. The results reveal a causal public-sector satisfaction premium and suggest a negative selection of individuals into the public sector. Part of the public-private satisfaction gap can be explained by the different availability of fringe benefits in the two sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 62
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Wage differentials between the public and the private sectors: evidence from an economy in transition [J].
Adamchik, VA ;
Bedi, AS .
LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2000, 7 (02) :203-224
[2]   Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice [J].
Angrist, JD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2001, 19 (01) :2-16
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OECD EC DEP WORKING
[4]  
[Anonymous], J EC SURVEYS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FIN REP UKR MASS PRI, VUSAID
[6]   ESTIMATING EFFECT OF TRAINING-PROGRAMS ON EARNINGS [J].
ASHENFELTER, O .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1978, 60 (01) :47-57
[7]   How well do theories of job matching explain variations in job satisfaction across education levels? Evidence for UK graduates [J].
Belfield, CR ;
Harris, RDF .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2002, 34 (05) :535-548
[8]   AN ANALYSIS OF WORKERS CHOICE BETWEEN EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS [J].
BLANK, RM .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1985, 38 (02) :211-224
[9]  
Borjas G., 2002, National Bureau of Economic Research
[10]   The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect [J].
Boswell, WR ;
Boudreau, JW ;
Tichy, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (05) :882-892