Voltammetric Study of Tin Electrodeposition on Polycrystalline Gold from Sulfuric and Methanesulfonic Acid

被引:11
作者
Aranzales, D. [1 ]
Wijenberg, J. H. O. J. [2 ]
Koper, M. T. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Leiden Inst Chem, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Tata Steel, Res & Dev, IJmuiden Technol Ctr, NL-1970 CA Ijmuiden, Netherlands
关键词
ELECTROCATALYTIC REDUCTION; HYDROGEN EVOLUTION; SN ALLOYS; ELECTROLYTE; ADSORPTION; KINETICS; PASSIVATION; DEPOSITION; COPPER; POWER;
D O I
10.1149/2.0211908jes
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
In this work, we have studied tin electrodeposition on polycrystalline gold electrodes from two different supporting electrolytes: sulfuric acid (SA) and methanesulfonic acid (MSA), both of them commonly used in the industry. This work aims to understand the effect of the different electrolyte anions on the deposition process. We show at least three different tin deposition mechanisms on gold: irreversible adsorption, underpotential deposition, and overpotential (bulk) deposition. Underpotential deposition leads to the formation of a layer of tin in SA and MSA with a coverage around theta(Sn(H2SO4)) = 0.45 ML (monolayer) and theta(Sn(CH3SO3H)) = 0.42 ML, respectively. The UPD Sn layer is however somewhat uncharacteristic as it is associated with island formation and surface alloying. Cyclic voltammograms in an extended potential range showed five distinct peaks: two cathodic peaks associated with tin underpotential and overpotential deposition, and three main anodic peaks, corresponding to the oxidation of the bulk Sn, of the AuSn intermetallic layer, and of the adsorbed Sn(II) to Sn(IV). Both voltammetric and rotating disk electrode measurements show that the kinetics of tin electrodeposition in MSA is slower than in SA, which we ascribe to Sn-MSA complex formation in solution. Slow Sn deposition in MSA promotes AuSn formation, in contrast to SA in which bulk tin deposition is more prominent. Complete Levich-type mass transport control of tin deposition in SA and MSA was only reached at low scan rate due to concurrent HER on the uncovered gold surface during the deposition process at higher scan rates. An unexpected surface-confined passivation process is observed in both electrolytes. (C) The Author(s) 2019. Published by ECS.
引用
收藏
页码:D283 / D289
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The investigation of the kinetics and mechanism of hydrogen evolution reaction on tin [J].
Azizi, O. ;
Jafarian, M. ;
Gobal, F. ;
Heli, H. ;
Mahjani, M. G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (12) :1755-1761
[2]   Influence of S-dodecylmercaptobenzimidazole as organic additive on electrodeposition of tin [J].
Bakkali, S. ;
Touir, R. ;
Cherkaoui, M. ;
Touhami, M. Ebn .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 261 :337-343
[3]   Electrodeposition of Cu-Sn alloys from a methanesulfonic acid electrolyte containing benzyl alcohol [J].
Bengoa, L. N. ;
Pary, P. ;
Conconi, M. S. ;
Egli, W. A. .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2017, 256 :211-219
[4]  
CAPELATO MD, 1995, J APPL ELECTROCHEM, V25, P408
[5]   ABNORMAL HIGH THROWING POWER AND CATHODE PASSIVITY IN ACID TIN PLATING BATHS [J].
CLARKE, M ;
BERNIE, JA .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 1967, 12 (02) :205-&
[6]   AN IRREVERSIBLE STRUCTURE SENSITIVE ADSORPTION STEP IN BISMUTH UNDERPOTENTIAL DEPOSITION AT PLATINUM-ELECTRODES [J].
CLAVILIER, J ;
FELIU, JM ;
ALDAZ, A .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 243 (02) :419-433
[7]   Electrodeposition of tin from a sulphate bath. An EQCM study [J].
Collazo, A. ;
Figueroa, R. ;
Novoa, X. R. ;
Perez, C. .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 280 :8-15
[8]   Deposition and stripping processes of tin on gold film electrodes studied by surface conductance [J].
Fonticelli, M ;
Tucceri, RI ;
Posadas, D .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 49 (28) :5197-5202
[9]   The role of hydrogen in metal electrodeposition processes [J].
Gabe, DR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 1997, 27 (08) :908-915
[10]   ROLE OF ADSORPTION PHENOMENA IN THE ELECTROCATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NITRIC-ACID AT A PLATINIZED PLATINUM-ELECTRODE [J].
HORANYI, G ;
RIZMAYER, EM .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1982, 140 (02) :347-366