Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection

被引:28
作者
Xu, Jia [1 ]
Bian, Yu-Hai [1 ]
Jin, Xin [1 ]
Cao, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ren Ji Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Metastatic lymph node ratio; Lymph node metastasis; Prognosis; RATIO; CARCINOMA; NUMBER; IMPACT; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; SUPERIORITY; MIGRATION; PATHOLOGY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v19.i12.1975
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To compare the prognostic assessment of lymph node ratio and absolute number based staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection. METHODS: The clinical, pathologic, and long-term follow-up data of 427 patients with gastric cancer that underwent D2 curative gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The relationships between the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and positive lymph nodes (pN) staging methods and the long-term prognoses of the patients were compared. In addition, the survival curves, accuracy, and homogeneity were compared with stratification to evaluate the prognostic assessment of the 3 methods when the number of tested lymph nodes was insufficient (< 10 and 10-15). RESULTS: MLR [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.401, P = 0.012], LODDS (HR = 1.012, P = 0.034), and pN (HR = 1.376, P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for gastric cancer patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the prognostic accuracy of the 3 methods was comparable (P > 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis confirmed that MLR, LODDS, and pN were all positively correlated with the total number of tested lymph nodes. When the number of tested lymph node was < 10, the value of survival curves staged by MLR and LODDS was superior to those of pN staging. However, the difference in survival curves between adjacent stages was not significant. In addition, the survival rate of stage 4 patients using the MLR and LODDS staging methods was 26.7% and 27.3% with < 10 lymph node, respectively which were significantly higher than the survival rate of patients with > 15 tested lymph nodes (< 4%). The ROC curve showed that the accuracy of the prognostic assessment of MLR, LODDS, and pN staging methods was comparable (P > 0.05), and the area under the ROC curve of all 3 methods were increased progressively with the enhanced levels of examined lymph nodes. In addition, the homogeneity of the 3 methods in patients with <= 15 tested lymph nodes also showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Neither MLR or LODDS could reduce the staging bias. A sufficient number of tested lymph nodes is key to ensure an accurate prognosis for patients underwent D2 radical gastrectomy. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1975 / 1983
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Comparison With the Sixth Classification [J].
Ahn, Hye Seong ;
Lee, Hyuk Joon ;
Hahn, Seokyung ;
Kim, Woo Ho ;
Lee, Kuhn Uk ;
Sano, Takeshi ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Yang, Han-Kwang .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (24) :5592-5598
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma
[3]   Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma [J].
Bando, E ;
Yonemura, Y ;
Taniguchi, K ;
Fushida, S ;
Fujimura, T ;
Miwa, K .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (08) :775-784
[4]   Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma [J].
Celen, Orhan ;
Yildirim, Emin ;
Berberoglu, Ugur .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 96 (02) :95-101
[5]   Morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 gastrectomy for cancer: Interim analysis of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group (IGCSG) randomised surgical trial [J].
Degiuli, M ;
Sasako, M ;
Calgaro, M ;
Garino, M ;
Rebecchi, F ;
Mineccia, M ;
Scaglione, D ;
Andreone, D ;
Ponti, A ;
Calvo, F .
EJSO, 2004, 30 (03) :303-308
[6]   Metastatic lymph node ratio versus number of metastatic lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer [J].
Espin, F. ;
Bianchi, A. ;
Llorca, S. ;
Feliu, J. ;
Palomera, E. ;
Garcia, O. ;
Remon, J. ;
Sunol, X. .
EJSO, 2012, 38 (06) :497-502
[7]   The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma [J].
Inoue, K ;
Nakane, Y ;
Iiyama, H ;
Sato, M ;
Kanbara, T ;
Nakai, K ;
Okumura, S ;
Yamamichi, K ;
Hioki, K .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (01) :27-34
[8]  
Jemal A, 2009, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V59, P225, DOI [10.3322/caac.20006, 10.3322/caac.21387]
[9]   Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts [J].
Joensuu, Heikki ;
Vehtari, Aki ;
Riihimaki, Jaakko ;
Nishida, Toshirou ;
Steigen, Sonja E. ;
Brabec, Peter ;
Plank, Lukas ;
Nilsson, Bengt ;
Cirilli, Claudia ;
Braconi, Chiara ;
Bordoni, Andrea ;
Magnusson, Magnus K. ;
Linke, Zdenek ;
Sufliarsky, Jozef ;
Federico, Massimo ;
Jonasson, Jon G. ;
Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo ;
Rutkowski, Piotr .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (03) :265-274
[10]   Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: Is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients - Discussion [J].
Siewert, JR ;
Brennan, MF ;
Sarr, MG ;
Greene, FL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (03) :370-371