Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner

被引:161
|
作者
Visser, Eric P. [1 ]
Disselhorst, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Brom, Maarten [1 ]
Laverman, Peter [1 ]
Gotthardt, Martin [1 ]
Oyen, Wim J. G. [1 ]
Boerman, Otto C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
positron emission tomography; small-animal; spatial resolution; sensitivity; image reconstruction; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.108.055152
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The Inveon small-animal PET scanner is characterized by a large, 127-mm axial length and a 161-mm crystal ring diameter. The associated high sensitivity is obtained by using all lines of response (LORs) up to the maximum ring difference (MRD) of 79, for which the most oblique LORs form acceptance angles of 38.3 degrees with transaxial planes. The result is 2 phenomena that are normally not encountered in PET scanners: a parallax or depth-of-interaction effect in the axial direction and the breakdown of Fourier rebinning (FORE). Both effects cause a deterioration of axial spatial resolution. Limiting the MRD to smaller values reduces this axial blurring at the cost of sensitivity. Alternatively, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techniques can be used in which the rebinning step is absent. The aim of this study was to experimentally determine the spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon for its whole field of view (FOV). Methods: Spatial resolution and sensitivity were measured using filtered backprojection (FBP) with FORE, FBP with LOR angle-weighted adapted FORE (AFORE), and 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization followed by maximum a posteriori reconstruction (OSEM3D/MAP). Results: Tangential and radial full width at half maximum (FWHM) showed almost no dependence on the MRD using FORE and FBP. Tangential FWHMs were 1.5 mm in the center of the FOV (CFOV) and 1.8 mm at the edge of the FOV (EFOV). Radial FWHMs were 1.5 and 3.0 mm in the CFOV and EFOV, respectively. In contrast, axial FWHMs increased with the MRD and ranged between 1.1 and 2.0 mm in the CFOV and between 1.5 and 2.7 mm in the EFOV for a MRD between 1 and 79. AFORE improved the axial resolution for a large part of the FOV, but image noise increased. OSEM3D/MAP yielded uniform spatial resolution in all directions, with an average FWHM of 1.65 +/- 0.06 mm. Sensitivity in the CFOV for the default energy and coincidence time window was 0.068; peak sensitivity was 0.111. Conclusion: The Inveon showed high spatial resolution and high sensitivity, both of which can be maintained using OSEM3D/MAP reconstruction instead of rebinning and 2D algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 147
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reconstruction algorithm with resolution deconvolution in a small-animal PET imager
    Tsyganov, EN
    Zinchenko, AI
    Slavine, NV
    Antich, PP
    Seliounine, SY
    Oz, OK
    Kulkami, PV
    Lewis, MA
    Mason, RP
    Parkey, RW
    SMALL ANIMAL SPECT IMAGING, 2005, : 163 - 175
  • [22] Scanner-Dependent Threshold Estimation of Wavelet Denoising for Small-Animal PET
    Zhao, Jie
    Lee, Jhih-Shian
    Xu, Hang
    Xu, Kai
    Ren, Zi-Hui
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    Wu, Cheng-Han
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2017, 64 (01) : 705 - 712
  • [23] Optimization of Spatial Resolution and Image Reconstruction Parameters for the Small-Animal Metis™ PET/CT System
    Zhao, Jie
    Liu, Qiong
    Li, Chaofan
    Song, Yunfeng
    Zhang, Ying
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [24] Scanning Multiple Mice in a Small-Animal PET Scanner: Influence on Image Quality
    Disselhorst, J. A.
    Siepel, F. J.
    van Lier, M. G. J. T.
    Chen, M.
    Meeuwis, A. P. W.
    Oyen, W. J. G.
    Boerman, O. C.
    Visser, E. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 : S294 - S294
  • [25] Scanning multiple mice in a small-animal PET scanner: Influence on image quality
    Siepel, Francoise J.
    van Lier, Monique G. J. T. B.
    Chen, Mu
    Disselhorst, Jonathan A.
    Meeuwis, Antoi P. W.
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Boerman, Otto C.
    Visser, Eric P.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2010, 621 (1-3): : 605 - 610
  • [26] Small-animal PET cameras
    Jeavons, AP
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 41 (08) : 1442 - 1443
  • [27] Simulated performance of a small-animal PET scanner based on monolithic scintillation detectors
    van der Laan, D. J.
    Maas, M. C.
    de Jong, H. W. A. M.
    Schaart, D. R.
    Bruyndonckx, P.
    Lemaitre, C.
    van Eijk, C. W. E.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 571 (1-2): : 227 - 230
  • [28] Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner
    Schäfers, KP
    Reader, AJ
    Kriens, M
    Knoess, C
    Schober, O
    Schäfers, M
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (06) : 996 - 1004
  • [29] The nanospect/ct: A high-sensitivity small-animal spect/ct with submillimeter spatial resolution
    Schramm, N. U.
    Lackas, C.
    Hoppin, J. W.
    Forrer, F.
    de Jong, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S117 - S117
  • [30] Performance Assessment of a Preclinical PET Scanner with Pinhole Collimation by Comparison to a Coincidence-Based Small-Animal PET Scanner
    Walker, Matthew D.
    Goorden, Marlies C.
    Dinelle, Katherine
    Ramakers, Ruud M.
    Blinder, Stephan
    Shirmohammad, Maryam
    van der Have, Frans
    Beekman, Freek J.
    Sossi, Vesna
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (08) : 1368 - 1374