A prospective, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release with trovafloxacin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

被引:20
|
作者
Sokol, WN
Sullivan, JG
Acampora, MD
Busman, TA
Notario, GF
机构
[1] Hlth Res Inst, Newport Beach, CA 92660 USA
[2] Pkwy Med Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Metrolina Med Res Associates, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
关键词
clarithromycin extended-release; fluoroquinolone; community-acquired pneumonia; trovafloxacin;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85136-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) generally include use of a macrolide, a fluoroquinolone, or doxycycline, although there is some debate concerning the use of a fluoroquinolone. Objective: The efficacy and tolerability of a new once-daily, extended-release (ER) formulation of clarithromycin were compared with those of a fluoroquinolone, trovafloxacin, in the treatment of patients with CAP. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-roup trial in which outpatients were randomized to receive 7 days of once-daily treatment with either clarithromycin ER (two 500-mg tablets) or trovafloxacin (200 mg). Eligible patients were greater than or equal to18 years old with signs and symptoms of pneumonia, radiologic evidence of an acute infiltrate, and mild to moderate infection, as classified by the investigator. Results: One hundred seventy-six patients were randomized to study treatment. They were primarily white (88%) and equally distributed between the sexes (52% female). Their mean (+/-SD) age was 47.5 +/- 16.2 years. Results were similar between treatment groups in rates of clinical cure, microbiologic cure, bacteriologic eradication, and radio logic success at the test-of-cure visit (14-21 days posttreatment) for both the perprotocol and intent-to-treat analyses. Among clinically evaluable patients, clinical cure rates for clarithromycin ER and trovafloxacin were 87% (74/85) and 95% (63/66), respectively, and radiologic success rates were 95% (80/84) and 95% (63/66), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between groups. In clinically and microbiologically evaluable patients, overall bacteriologic eradication rates were 89% (85/95) for clarithromycin ER and 96% (64/67) for trovafloxacin, with no significant differences between groups. Both antibiotics demonstrated high eradication rates against target microorganisms. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of specific drug-related adverse events. The majority of drug-related adverse events (>90%) were considered mild or moderate and resolved without the need for additional treatment. Conclusions: Although the study was prematurely terminated, resulting in inadequate power to demonstrate equivalence, once-daily clarithromycin ER was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ambulatory adult (age greater than or equal to18 years) outpatients with CAP.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 615
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Gotfried, MH
    Dattani, D
    Riffer, E
    Devcich, KJ
    Busman, TA
    Notario, GF
    Palmer, RN
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (05) : 736 - 751
  • [2] Clarithromycin extended-release in community-acquired respiratory tract infections
    Williams, KN
    Bishai, WR
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 6 (16) : 2867 - 2876
  • [3] Oral empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia - A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing sparfloxacin with roxithromycin
    Ortqvist, A
    Valtonen, M
    Cars, O
    Wahl, M
    Saikku, P
    Jean, C
    Holmen, C
    Werner, M
    Stenlund, G
    Danielsson, A
    Hagberg, L
    Nilsson, BO
    Nystrom, G
    Augustinsson, A
    Otto, G
    Ljungstrom, L
    Boman, H
    Hebelka, M
    Odenholdt, I
    Schonbeck, C
    Hjalt, CA
    Leinonen, M
    Harno, K
    Kyronseppa, H
    Mattson, K
    Sammalkorpi, K
    Riska, H
    Kuha, R
    Kiukaanniemi, H
    Ringdahl, N
    CHEST, 1996, 110 (06) : 1499 - 1506
  • [4] A multicenter study of grepafloxacin and clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Moola, S
    Hagberg, L
    Churchyard, GA
    Dylewski, JS
    Sedani, S
    Staley, H
    CHEST, 1999, 116 (04) : 974 - 983
  • [5] A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy comparative study of gatifloxacin with clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Lode, H
    Aronkyto, T
    Chuchalin, AG
    Jaaskevi, M
    Kahnovskii, I
    Kleutgens, K
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [6] Cefditoren pivoxil versus cefpodoxime proxetil for community-acquired pneumonia: Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    van Zyl, L
    le Roux, JG
    LaFata, JA
    Volk, RS
    Palo, WA
    Flamm, R
    Hom, RC
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) : 1840 - 1853
  • [7] A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter comparison of parenteral ertapenem and ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia
    Vetter, N
    Cambronero-Hernandez, E
    Rohlf, J
    Simon, S
    Carides, A
    Oliveria, T
    Isaacs, R
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) : 1770 - 1785
  • [8] A randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral nemonoxacin with oral levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Yingyuan
    Wu, Jufang
    Zhu, Demei
    Sun, Shenghua
    Zhao, Li
    Wang, Xuefeng
    Liu, Hua
    Ren, Zhenyi
    Wang, Changzheng
    Xiu, Qingyu
    Xiao, Zuke
    Cao, Zhaolong
    Cui, Shehuai
    Yang, Heping
    Liang, Yongjie
    Chen, Ping
    Lv, Yuan
    Hu, Chengping
    Lv, Xiaoju
    Liu, Shuang
    Kuang, Jiulong
    Li, Jianguo
    Wang, Dexi
    Chang, Liwen
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 50 (06) : 811 - 820
  • [9] A randomised, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with ceftriaxone with or without linezolid for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation
    Nicholson, Susan C.
    Welte, Tobias
    File, Thomas M., Jr.
    Strauss, Richard S.
    Michiels, Bart
    Kaul, Pratibha
    Balis, Dainius
    Arbit, Deborah
    Amsler, Karen
    Noel, Gary J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2012, 39 (03) : 240 - 246
  • [10] Resurgence of common respiratory viruses in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) - A prospective multicenter study
    Daehne, Theo
    Bauer, Wolfgang
    Essig, Andreas
    Schaaf, Bernhard
    Barten-Neiner, Grit
    Spinner, Christoph D.
    Pletz, Mathias W.
    Rohde, Gernot
    Rupp, Jan
    Witzenrath, Martin
    Panning, Marcus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 173