Assessing the feasibility of mapping the tibialis anterior muscle with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in neuro-oncologic patients

被引:4
|
作者
Eibl, Thomas [1 ]
Schrey, Michael [1 ]
Weigel, Jens [1 ]
Liebert, Adrian [1 ]
Lange, Ruediger [2 ]
Staedt, Michael [3 ]
Eff, Florian [3 ]
Holtmannspoetter, Markus [3 ]
Steiner, Hans-Herbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Neurol, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Sect Neuroradiol, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
关键词
MOTOR REPRESENTATION; BRAIN-TUMORS; TMS; HEALTHY; EXCITABILITY; IMPROVES; SURGERY; TRACTOGRAPHY; HOTSPOT; GLIOMAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-23444-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mapping the lower extremity with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) still remains challenging for the investigator. Clinical factors influencing leg mapping with nTMS have not been fully investigated yet. The aim of the study was to identify factors which influence the possibility of eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the tibialis anterior muscle (TA). Patient records, imaging, nTMS examinations and tractography were retrospectively evaluated. 48 nTMS examinations were performed in 46 brain tumor patients. Reproducible MEPs were recorded in 20 patients (41.67%). Younger age (p = 0.044) and absence of perifocal edema (p = 0.035, Cramer's V = 0.34, OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.81) facilitated mapping the TA muscle. Leg motor deficit (p = 0.49, Cramer's V = 0.12, OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.12-2.36), tumor entity (p = 0.36, Cramer's V = 0.22), tumor location (p = 0.52, Cramer's V = 0.26) and stimulation intensity (p = 0.158) were no significant factors. The distance between the tumor and the pyramidal tract was higher (p = 0.005) in patients with successful mapping of the TA. The possibility to stimulate the leg motor area was associated with no postoperative aggravation of motor deficits in general (p = 0.005, Cramer's V = 0.45, OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.46-0.85) but could not serve as a specific predictor of postoperative lower extremity function. In conclusion, successful mapping of the TA muscle for neurosurgical planning is influenced by young patient age, absence of edema and greater distance to the CST, whereas tumor entity and stimulation intensity were non-significant.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of coil placement and orientation on the assessment of focal excitability in motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Reijonen, Jusa
    Saisanen, Laura
    Kononen, Mervi
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Julkunen, Petro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2020, 331
  • [42] Preoperative motor mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation improves outcome for motor eloquent lesions
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    Sabih, Jamil
    Bulubasova, Lucia
    Obermueller, Thomas
    Negwer, Chiara
    Janssen, Insa
    Shiban, Ehab
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Ringel, Florian
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (09) : 1274 - 1282
  • [43] Application of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping for adjuvant radiotherapy planning in patients with high-grade gliomas
    Diehl, Christian D.
    Schwendner, Maximilian J.
    Sollmann, Nico
    Oechsner, Markus
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Combs, Stephanie E.
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 138 : 30 - 37
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of preoperative motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in patients with high-grade glioma
    Butenschoen, Vicki M.
    Ille, Sebastian
    Sollmann, Nico
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (06)
  • [45] In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "First United Kingdom Experience of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Preoperative Mapping of Brain Tumors"
    Jung, Josephine
    Lavrador, Jose-Pedro
    Patel, Sabina
    Giamouriadis, Anastasios
    Lam, Jordan
    Bhangoo, Ranjeev
    Ashkan, Keyoumars
    Vergani, Francesco
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : 551 - 552
  • [46] Comparison of hemispheric dominance and correlation of evoked speech responses between functional magnetic resonance imaging and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in language mapping
    Durner, Gregor
    Pala, Andrej
    Federle, Lena
    Grolik, Brigitta
    Wirtz, Christian R.
    Coburger, Jan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 63 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [47] Impairment of preoperative language mapping by lesion location: a functional magnetic resonance imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation study
    Ille, Sebastian
    Sollmann, Nico
    Hauck, Theresa
    Maurer, Stefanie
    Tanigawa, Noriko
    Obermueller, Thomas
    Negwer, Chiara
    Droese, Doris
    Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Ringel, Florian
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 123 (02) : 314 - 324
  • [48] Intra and inter-session reliability of rapid Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation stimulus-response curves of tibialis anterior muscle in healthy older adults
    Peri, Elisabetta
    Ambrosini, Emilia
    Colombo, Vera Maria
    van de Ruit, Mark
    Grey, Michael J.
    Monticone, Marco
    Ferriero, Giorgio
    Pedrocchi, Alessandra
    Ferrigno, Giancarlo
    Ferrante, Simona
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [49] Evaluation of Changes in Preoperative Cortical Excitability by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Brain Tumor
    Neville, Iuri Santana
    dos Santos, Alexandra Gomes
    Almeida, Cesar Cimonari
    Hayashi, Cintya Yukie
    Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
    Galhardoni, Ricardo
    de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
    Paiva, Wellingson Silva
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [50] Accelerometer-based automatic voice onset detection in speech mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Vitikainen, Anne-Mari
    Makela, Elina
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Jousmaki, Veikko
    Makela, Jyrki P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2015, 253 : 70 - 77