Assessing the feasibility of mapping the tibialis anterior muscle with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in neuro-oncologic patients

被引:4
|
作者
Eibl, Thomas [1 ]
Schrey, Michael [1 ]
Weigel, Jens [1 ]
Liebert, Adrian [1 ]
Lange, Ruediger [2 ]
Staedt, Michael [3 ]
Eff, Florian [3 ]
Holtmannspoetter, Markus [3 ]
Steiner, Hans-Herbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Neurol, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Sect Neuroradiol, Breslauer Str 201, D-90471 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
关键词
MOTOR REPRESENTATION; BRAIN-TUMORS; TMS; HEALTHY; EXCITABILITY; IMPROVES; SURGERY; TRACTOGRAPHY; HOTSPOT; GLIOMAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-23444-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mapping the lower extremity with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) still remains challenging for the investigator. Clinical factors influencing leg mapping with nTMS have not been fully investigated yet. The aim of the study was to identify factors which influence the possibility of eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the tibialis anterior muscle (TA). Patient records, imaging, nTMS examinations and tractography were retrospectively evaluated. 48 nTMS examinations were performed in 46 brain tumor patients. Reproducible MEPs were recorded in 20 patients (41.67%). Younger age (p = 0.044) and absence of perifocal edema (p = 0.035, Cramer's V = 0.34, OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.81) facilitated mapping the TA muscle. Leg motor deficit (p = 0.49, Cramer's V = 0.12, OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.12-2.36), tumor entity (p = 0.36, Cramer's V = 0.22), tumor location (p = 0.52, Cramer's V = 0.26) and stimulation intensity (p = 0.158) were no significant factors. The distance between the tumor and the pyramidal tract was higher (p = 0.005) in patients with successful mapping of the TA. The possibility to stimulate the leg motor area was associated with no postoperative aggravation of motor deficits in general (p = 0.005, Cramer's V = 0.45, OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.46-0.85) but could not serve as a specific predictor of postoperative lower extremity function. In conclusion, successful mapping of the TA muscle for neurosurgical planning is influenced by young patient age, absence of edema and greater distance to the CST, whereas tumor entity and stimulation intensity were non-significant.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on tibialis anterior activity during walking in humans
    Rambour, Melanie
    Caux-Dedeystere, Alexandre
    Devanne, Herve
    Defebvre, Luc
    Derambure, Philippe
    Delval, Arnaud
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2016, 616 : 49 - 56
  • [22] Preoperative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: New Insight for Brain Tumor-Related Language Mapping
    Natalizi, Federica
    Piras, Federica
    Vecchio, Daniela
    Spalletta, Gianfranco
    Piras, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [23] The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Sollmann, Nico
    Bulubas, Lucia
    Tanigawa, Noriko
    Zimmer, Claus
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 18
  • [24] Cortical mapping of receptive language processing in children using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Selassie, Gunilla Rejno-Habte
    Pegenius, Goran
    Karlsson, Tomas
    Viggedal, Gerd
    Hallbook, Tove
    Elam, Mikael
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 103
  • [25] Brain tumor surgery guided by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for arithmetic calculation
    Bonaudo, Camilla
    Pedone, Agnese
    Capelli, Federico
    Gori, Benedetta
    Baldanzi, Fabrizio
    Fedi, Francesca
    Troiano, Simone
    Maiorelli, Antonio
    Masi, Giulia
    Martinelli, Cristiana
    Pieropan, Edoardo
    Castaldi, Elisa
    Capialbi, Nicole Amanda
    Don, Shani Enderage
    Battista, Francesca
    Campagnaro, Luca
    Muscas, Giovanni
    Amadori, Andrea
    Fainardi, Enrico
    Carrai, Riccardo
    Grippo, Antonello
    Della Puppa, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 141 (06) : 1623 - 1634
  • [26] Functional brain mapping of patients with arteriovenous malformations using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation: first experience in ten patients
    Naoki Kato
    Sarah Schilt
    Heike Schneider
    Dietmar Frey
    Markus Kufeld
    Peter Vajkoczy
    Thomas Picht
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2014, 156 : 885 - 895
  • [27] Non-invasive mapping of calculation function by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Maurer, Stefanie
    Tanigawa, Noriko
    Sollmann, Nico
    Hauck, Theresa
    Ille, Sebastian
    Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2016, 221 (08) : 3927 - 3947
  • [28] Intra- and interobserver variability of language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation
    Sollmann, Nico
    Hauck, Theresa
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Ringel, Florian
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14
  • [29] Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the motor cortex for preoperative diagnostics in pediatric epilepsy
    Schramm, Severin
    Mehta, Aashna
    Auguste, Kurtis, I
    Tarapore, Phiroz E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2021, 28 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [30] When imaging meets neurophysiology: the value of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative neurophysiological mapping prior to brain tumor surgery
    Raffa, Giovanni
    Quattropani, Maria Catena
    Germano, Antonino
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 47 (06)