Tough-mindedness and fair play - Personality traits as predictors of attitudes toward the death penalty - an exploratory gendered study

被引:26
作者
Robbers, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Marymount Univ, Dept Sociol, Arlington, VA 22207 USA
来源
PUNISHMENT & SOCIETY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PENOLOGY | 2006年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
capital punishment; gender; personality traits; public opinion;
D O I
10.1177/1462474506062104
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
One of the most potentially important factors in determining public and potential jury members' attitudes toward the death penalty may be personality traits. There have been few recent studies conducted on the relationship between personality traits and attitudes toward the death penalty and these have produced conflicting results. Earlier research has suggested that extroverted people are tough-minded while introverts are more likely to consider mitigating circumstances. This study examines the effects of the five-factor model of personality traits on attitudes toward the death penalty and includes gendered analyses. Results from the study indicated that both extroversion and neuroticism could predict pro-death penalty attitudes, and this effect held across gender groups. Conscientiousness was also associated with pro-death penalty attitudes. Openness to experience and agreeableness were both able to predict less favorable attitudes toward the death penalty. Gendered analyses revealed that among males, openness was a significant predictor of anti-death penalty attitudes, but it was not for females, and the opposite was true of conscientiousness. Suggestions for further research and a discussion of implications of the research are included in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 222
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[2]  
Antonio ME, 2004, JUDICATURE, V87, P274
[3]   Do juries meet our expectations? [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Mellers, BA .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 26 (06) :625-639
[4]  
Benekos P.J., 2002, J CRIM JUSTICE EDUC, V13, P273, DOI DOI 10.1080/10511250200085481
[5]  
Bernard J. L., 1984, LAW PSYCHOL REV, V8, P105
[6]  
BOHM RM, 1998, AM EXPT CAPITAL PUNI, P25
[7]  
BONCZAR TP, 2004, BUREAU JUSTICE S NOV
[8]   The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials [J].
Butler, BM ;
Moran, G .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 26 (02) :175-184
[9]  
CALLAHAN L, 2000, AM J CRIMINAL JUSTIC, V25, P15
[10]   SENTENCING GOALS, CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS, IDEOLOGY, AND PERSONALITY [J].
CARROLL, JS ;
PERKOWITZ, WT ;
LURIGIO, AJ ;
WEAVER, FM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (01) :107-118