Plasmatic catecholamines after neuraxial labour analgesia: A randomised controlled trial comparing epidural versus combined spinal-epidural

被引:3
|
作者
Santos, Shirley Andrade [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fernandes, Hermann Dos Santos [1 ,2 ]
Nani, Fernando Souza [2 ]
Bartilotti, Andreza Gonzaga [2 ]
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira [2 ]
Carmona, Maria Jose Carvalho [2 ]
Bliacheriene, Fernando [2 ]
Vieira, Joaquim Edson [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Sinai Hlth Syst, 600 Univ Ave,Room 7-405, Toronto, ON M6G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Labour analgesia; Obstetrical anaesthesia; Spinal; Epidural; Fetal distress; Catecholamines; HEART-RATE ABNORMALITIES; INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL; FETAL BRADYCARDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101148
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labour analgesia has been associated with fetal bradycardia and uterine hypertonia when compared with epidural analgesia (EA), possibly due to a decrease in epinephrine levels following neuraxial anaesthesia. However, there are no recent studies comparing plasmatic catecholamines levels between those two techniques. This study aimed to compare CSE versus EA regarding pre- and post-analgesia catecholamines levels, uterine tone and fetal heart rate.Patients and methods: Randomised clinical trial with 47 labouring patients divided in two groups (CSE and EA). Primary outcome was plasmatic catecholamine measurements before and after neuraxial block. Secondary outcomes were fetal heart rate changes, uterine hypertonia, hypotension episodes, pain relief and fetal outcomes. Results: For CSE group, the median decrease of plasmatic epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 480-(+) 41] and for norepinephrine was -21 pg/mL [(-) 2507-(+) 94]. For EA group, the median decrease for epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 326-(+) 15] and for norepinephrine was -5 pg/mL [(-) 190-(+76)]. There were no differences between groups (p = 0.96 and p = 0.63 for epinephrine and norepinephrine, respectively). There were no differences for secondary outcomes.Conclusions: There was no evidence of a more significant decrease of catecholamines with CSE when compared with EA. Catecholamines decrease theory may not be valid for modern labour analgesia techniques. ⠃C 2022 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise d'anesthe acute accent sie et de re acute accent animation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor
    Groden, J.
    Gonzalez-Fiol, A.
    Aaronson, J.
    Sachs, A.
    Smiley, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 26 : 4 - 7
  • [22] Fentanyl versus tramadol with levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor
    Chatrath, Veena
    Khetarpal, Ranjana
    Sharma, Sujata
    Kumari, Pratibha
    Sudha
    Bali, Kusum
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [23] Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia
    Wang, Yanshuang
    Xu, Mingjun
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [24] Acute subdural intracranial hematoma after combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor
    Abbinante, C.
    Lauta, E.
    Di Venosa, N.
    Ribezzi, M.
    Colamaria, A.
    Ciappetta, P.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2010, 76 (12) : 1091 - 1094
  • [25] Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour (Withdrawn Paper. 2007, art. no. CD003401)
    Simmons, S. W.
    Cyna, A. M.
    Dennis, A. T.
    Hughes, D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (03):
  • [26] Obstetrical analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural analgesia.
    Roux, M
    Wattrisse, G
    Tai, RBH
    Dufossez, F
    Krivosic-Horber, R
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1999, 18 (05): : 487 - 498
  • [27] Analgesic efficacy of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural technique in multiparous women during labour
    Blajic, Iva
    Zagar, Tea
    Semrl, Neli
    Umek, Nejc
    Lucovnik, Miha
    Pintaric, Tatjana Stopar
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 92 (11) : 797 - 803
  • [28] EFFECTS ON MOTHER AND FETUS OF EPIDURAL AND COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL TECHNIQUES FOR LABOR ANALGESIA
    Nakamura, Giane
    Ganem, Eliana Marisa
    Suppo de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria
    Machado Castiglia, Yara Marcondes
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2009, 55 (04): : 405 - 409
  • [29] Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rao, Wan-Yi
    Xu, Fang
    Dai, Shao-Bing
    Mei, Zhong
    Chen, Xiao-Ping
    Lv, Chang-Cheng
    Liu, Chun-Lei
    Kee, Warwick Ngan
    Chen, Xin-Zhong
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 2077 - 2085
  • [30] Combined spinal-epidural block for labor analgesia. Comparative study with continuous epidural block
    de Assuncao Braga, Angelica de Fatima
    Carvalho, Vanessa Henriques
    da Silva Braga, Franklin Sarmento
    Costa Pereira, Rosa Ines
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (01): : 7 - 12