Plasmatic catecholamines after neuraxial labour analgesia: A randomised controlled trial comparing epidural versus combined spinal-epidural

被引:3
|
作者
Santos, Shirley Andrade [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fernandes, Hermann Dos Santos [1 ,2 ]
Nani, Fernando Souza [2 ]
Bartilotti, Andreza Gonzaga [2 ]
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira [2 ]
Carmona, Maria Jose Carvalho [2 ]
Bliacheriene, Fernando [2 ]
Vieira, Joaquim Edson [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Sinai Hlth Syst, 600 Univ Ave,Room 7-405, Toronto, ON M6G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Labour analgesia; Obstetrical anaesthesia; Spinal; Epidural; Fetal distress; Catecholamines; HEART-RATE ABNORMALITIES; INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL; FETAL BRADYCARDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101148
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labour analgesia has been associated with fetal bradycardia and uterine hypertonia when compared with epidural analgesia (EA), possibly due to a decrease in epinephrine levels following neuraxial anaesthesia. However, there are no recent studies comparing plasmatic catecholamines levels between those two techniques. This study aimed to compare CSE versus EA regarding pre- and post-analgesia catecholamines levels, uterine tone and fetal heart rate.Patients and methods: Randomised clinical trial with 47 labouring patients divided in two groups (CSE and EA). Primary outcome was plasmatic catecholamine measurements before and after neuraxial block. Secondary outcomes were fetal heart rate changes, uterine hypertonia, hypotension episodes, pain relief and fetal outcomes. Results: For CSE group, the median decrease of plasmatic epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 480-(+) 41] and for norepinephrine was -21 pg/mL [(-) 2507-(+) 94]. For EA group, the median decrease for epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 326-(+) 15] and for norepinephrine was -5 pg/mL [(-) 190-(+76)]. There were no differences between groups (p = 0.96 and p = 0.63 for epinephrine and norepinephrine, respectively). There were no differences for secondary outcomes.Conclusions: There was no evidence of a more significant decrease of catecholamines with CSE when compared with EA. Catecholamines decrease theory may not be valid for modern labour analgesia techniques. ⠃C 2022 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise d'anesthe acute accent sie et de re acute accent animation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN ADVANCED LABOR
    ABOULEISH, A
    ABOULEISH, E
    CAMANN, W
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (07): : 575 - 578
  • [12] Fetal effects of combined spinal-epidural vs epidural labour analgesia: a prospective, randomised double-blind study
    Patel, N. P.
    El-Wahab, N.
    Fernando, R.
    Wilson, S.
    Robson, S. C.
    Columb, M. O.
    Lyons, G. R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (05) : 458 - 467
  • [13] Placental abruption occurring soon after labor combined spinal-epidural analgesia
    Jaime, F.
    Degani, J.
    Lam, N.
    Allen, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 21 (04) : 376 - 379
  • [14] Prophylactic intravenous ephedrine to minimize fetal bradycardia after combined spinal-epidural labour analgesia: a randomized controlled study
    Gambling, David
    Bender, Miriam
    Faron, Sue
    Glaser, Dale
    Farrell, Thomas R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2015, 62 (11): : 1201 - 1208
  • [15] Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
    Singh, Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
    Yahya, Nurlia
    Misiran, Karis
    Masdar, Azlina
    Nor, Nadia Md
    Yee, Lee Choon
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2016, 66 (03): : 259 - 264
  • [16] Adverse effects of combined spinal-epidural versus traditional epidural analgesia during labor
    Skupski, Daniel W.
    Abramovitz, Sharon
    Samuels, Jon
    Pressimone, Vanessa
    Kjaer, Klaus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 106 (03) : 242 - 245
  • [17] Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl
    Tveit, Tor O.
    Seiler, Stephen
    Halvorsen, Arthur
    Rosland, Jan H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 129 - 136
  • [18] Combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia induced maternal fever with a similar timing during labor-A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Chu, Qinjun
    Sun, Yan
    Bai, Lihui
    Bai, Yafan
    Zhang, Dongqing
    Zheng, Ping
    Jin, Xiaogao
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [19] Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial
    Freeman, Liv M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W.
    Franssen, Maureen T.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N.
    Hajenius, Petra J.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Woiski, Mallory D.
    Porath, Martina
    van den Berg, Hans J.
    van Beek, Erik
    Borchert, Odette W. H. M.
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    Sikkema, J. Marko
    Kuipers, A. H. M.
    Logtenberg, Sabine L. M.
    van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Lopriore, Enrico
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    le Cessie, Saskia
    van Lith, Jan M.
    Struys, Michel M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Dahan, Albert
    Middeldorp, Johanna M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [20] Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: comparison of two doses of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl
    Lee, BB
    Kee, WDH
    Hung, VYS
    Wong, ELY
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (06) : 868 - 871