Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries

被引:14
|
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Albers, Lucia [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Umea Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
关键词
lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LLIF; intraoperative neuromonitoring; IONM; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RESPECT; PLEXUS; ARTHRODESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently used for anterior column stabilization. Many authors have reported that intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the lumbar plexus nerves is mandatory for this approach. However, even with IONM, the reported motor and sensory deficits are still considerably high. Thus, the authors' approach was to focus on the indication, trajectory, and technique instead of relying on IONM findings per se. The objective of this study therefore was to analyze the outcome of our large cohort of patients who underwent LLIF without IONM. METHODS The authors report on 157 patients included from 2010 to 2016 who underwent LLIF as an additional stabilizing procedure following dorsal instrumentation. LLIF-related complications as well as clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 15.9 +/- 12.0 months. For 90.0% of patients, cage implantation by LLIF was the first retroperitoneal surgery. There were no cases of surgery-related hematoma, vascular injury, CSF leak, or any other visceral injury. Between 1 and 4 cages were implanted per surgery, most commonly at L2-3 and L3-4. The mean length of surgery was 92.7 +/- 35 minutes, and blood loss was 63.8 +/- 57 ml. At discharge, 3.8% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness, a new sensory deficit, or the deterioration of leg pain due to LLIF surgery. Three months after surgery, 3.5% of the followed patients still reported surgery-related motor weakness, 3.6% leg pain, and 9.6% a persistent sensory deficit due to LLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series demonstrate that the complication rates for LLIF without IONM are comparable, if not superior, to those in previously reported series using IONM. Hence, the authors conclude that IONM is not mandatory for LLIF procedures if the surgical approach is tailored to the respective level and if the visualization of nerves is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors and prevention strategy for patient dissatisfaction after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center retrospective study
    Yang, Lixin
    Guo, Zhao
    Qiao, Yuhao
    Guo, Jichao
    Li, Jiaqi
    Wang, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [42] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with placement of steerable banana cage: A single-center retrospective analysis of radiographic parameters of success
    Levy, A. S.
    Maddy, K.
    Murray, A.
    John, D. L.
    Kumar, V.
    Urakov, T.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 163 - 167
  • [43] Intraoperative computed tomography-guided navigation versus fluoroscopy for single-position surgery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Nomura, Satoshi
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 93 : 75 - 81
  • [44] Early Radiological Assessment of Static and Expandable Cages in Lateral Single Position for Indirect Decompression- Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Sato, Masato
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 178 : E453 - E464
  • [45] Coronal vertical fracture of vertebral body following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: risk factor analysis in consecutive case series
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Kim, Yong-Chan
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Bae, Hyun
    Kim, Sang-Il
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [46] Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Nomura, Satoshi
    Sato, Masato
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [47] Comparison of Intraoperative Endplate Injury between Mini-Open Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Analysis of Risk Factors: A Retrospective Study
    Jing, Xiaowei
    Gong, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Ning
    Xu, Zhengkuan
    Qiu, Xiaowen
    Li, Fangcai
    Liu, Wei
    Hu, Qingfeng
    Chen, Qixin
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (01)
  • [48] The Evaluation of Indirect Neural Decompression After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography Myelogram
    Hayama, Sachio
    Nakano, Atsushi
    Nakaya, Yoshiharu
    Baba, Ichiro
    Fujiwara, Kenta
    Fujishiro, Takashi
    Yano, Toma
    Usami, Yoshitada
    Kino, Keiichiro
    Obo, Takuya
    Neo, Masashi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : E710 - E718
  • [49] Complication rates following stand-alone lateral interbody fusion: a single institution series after 10 years of experience
    Godolias, Periklis
    Tataryn, Zachary L.
    Frieler, Sven
    Nunna, Ravi
    Charlot, Kaarina
    Tran, Angela
    Pluemer, Jonathan
    Cibura, Charlotte
    Al-Awadi, Hamzah
    Daher, Zeyad
    Dudda, Marcel
    Schildhauer, Thomas A.
    Chapman, Jens
    Oskouian, Rod
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 2121 - 2127
  • [50] Early Experiences With Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Safety and Outcomes
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Maayan, Omri
    Shahi, Pratyush
    Du, Jerry
    Araghi, Kasra
    Amen, Troy B.
    Shinn, Daniel
    Song, Junho
    Dalal, Sidhant
    Sheha, Evan
    Dowdell, James
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    HSS JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (04) : 515 - 521