Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries

被引:14
|
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Albers, Lucia [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Umea Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
关键词
lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LLIF; intraoperative neuromonitoring; IONM; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RESPECT; PLEXUS; ARTHRODESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently used for anterior column stabilization. Many authors have reported that intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the lumbar plexus nerves is mandatory for this approach. However, even with IONM, the reported motor and sensory deficits are still considerably high. Thus, the authors' approach was to focus on the indication, trajectory, and technique instead of relying on IONM findings per se. The objective of this study therefore was to analyze the outcome of our large cohort of patients who underwent LLIF without IONM. METHODS The authors report on 157 patients included from 2010 to 2016 who underwent LLIF as an additional stabilizing procedure following dorsal instrumentation. LLIF-related complications as well as clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 15.9 +/- 12.0 months. For 90.0% of patients, cage implantation by LLIF was the first retroperitoneal surgery. There were no cases of surgery-related hematoma, vascular injury, CSF leak, or any other visceral injury. Between 1 and 4 cages were implanted per surgery, most commonly at L2-3 and L3-4. The mean length of surgery was 92.7 +/- 35 minutes, and blood loss was 63.8 +/- 57 ml. At discharge, 3.8% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness, a new sensory deficit, or the deterioration of leg pain due to LLIF surgery. Three months after surgery, 3.5% of the followed patients still reported surgery-related motor weakness, 3.6% leg pain, and 9.6% a persistent sensory deficit due to LLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series demonstrate that the complication rates for LLIF without IONM are comparable, if not superior, to those in previously reported series using IONM. Hence, the authors conclude that IONM is not mandatory for LLIF procedures if the surgical approach is tailored to the respective level and if the visualization of nerves is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screw Stimulation Thresholds for Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Correlational Study
    Abbasi, Hamid
    Moore, Dominic J.
    Rajaeirad, Mohadese
    Zhan, Jiawen
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [32] Complications associated with single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and pooled analysis
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Cecchi, Bayron Valenzuela
    O'Neill, Luke K.
    Chapple, Kristina M.
    Zhou, James J.
    Alan, Nima
    Gooldy, Timothy C.
    DiDomenico, Joseph D.
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (03) : 380 - 386
  • [33] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5
    Jang, Hae-Dong
    Lee, Jae Chul
    Seo, Jong-Hyeon
    Roh, Young-Ho
    Choi, Sung-Woo
    Shin, Byung-Joon
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E10 - E18
  • [34] Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5
    Campbell, Peter G.
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Cavanaugh, David
    Kerr, Eubulus
    Utter, Philip Andrew
    Frank, Kelly
    Stone, Marcus
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [35] Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series
    Alan, Nima
    Vodovotz, Lena
    Muthiah, Nallammai
    Deng, Hansen
    Guha, Daipayan
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Ozpinar, Alp
    Mushlin, Harry M.
    Puccio, Lauren
    Hamilton, David K.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (05) : 663 - 669
  • [36] Analysis of Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined With Image Guidance for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Liu, Xilin
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    Saadeh, Yamaan
    Park, Paul
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 14 (06) : 620 - 626
  • [37] Indications and limitations of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion without osteotomy for adult spinal deformity
    Ohba, Tetsuro
    Ebata, Shigeto
    Ikegami, Shota
    Oba, Hiroki
    Haro, Hirotaka
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (06) : 1362 - 1370
  • [38] Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation
    Oujie Lai
    Yunlin Chen
    Qixin Chen
    Yong Hu
    Weihu Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [39] Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Tan, Marcus Wei Ping
    Sayampanathan, Andrew A.
    Jiang, Lei
    Guo, Chang Ming
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (10): : 395 - 405
  • [40] Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation
    Lai, Oujie
    Chen, Yunlin
    Chen, Qixin
    Hu, Yong
    Ma, Weihu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)