Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries

被引:14
|
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Albers, Lucia [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Umea Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
关键词
lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LLIF; intraoperative neuromonitoring; IONM; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RESPECT; PLEXUS; ARTHRODESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is frequently used for anterior column stabilization. Many authors have reported that intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the lumbar plexus nerves is mandatory for this approach. However, even with IONM, the reported motor and sensory deficits are still considerably high. Thus, the authors' approach was to focus on the indication, trajectory, and technique instead of relying on IONM findings per se. The objective of this study therefore was to analyze the outcome of our large cohort of patients who underwent LLIF without IONM. METHODS The authors report on 157 patients included from 2010 to 2016 who underwent LLIF as an additional stabilizing procedure following dorsal instrumentation. LLIF-related complications as well as clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 15.9 +/- 12.0 months. For 90.0% of patients, cage implantation by LLIF was the first retroperitoneal surgery. There were no cases of surgery-related hematoma, vascular injury, CSF leak, or any other visceral injury. Between 1 and 4 cages were implanted per surgery, most commonly at L2-3 and L3-4. The mean length of surgery was 92.7 +/- 35 minutes, and blood loss was 63.8 +/- 57 ml. At discharge, 3.8% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness, a new sensory deficit, or the deterioration of leg pain due to LLIF surgery. Three months after surgery, 3.5% of the followed patients still reported surgery-related motor weakness, 3.6% leg pain, and 9.6% a persistent sensory deficit due to LLIF surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this series demonstrate that the complication rates for LLIF without IONM are comparable, if not superior, to those in previously reported series using IONM. Hence, the authors conclude that IONM is not mandatory for LLIF procedures if the surgical approach is tailored to the respective level and if the visualization of nerves is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Saadeh, Yamaan S.
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    Kirsch, Michael J.
    Sabbagh, Amr M.
    Park, Paul
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E1374 - E1378
  • [22] Lateral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) for thoracolumbar spine trauma (Trauma LLIF): A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study
    Gianoli, Daniele
    Battig, Linda
    Bertulli, Lorenzo
    Forster, Thomas
    Martens, Benjamin
    Stienen, Martin N.
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 19
  • [23] Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Prone: Single-Centric Case-Series
    Rodrigo Amaral
    Jack Miles
    Gabriel Pokorny
    Fernando Marcelino
    Rafael Moriguchi
    Igor Barreira
    Jullyene Pokorny
    Weby Mizael
    Luiz Pimenta
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 5 (1)
  • [24] Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Results of Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series
    Ehresman, Jeff
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Battista, Madison
    Lee, Katriel E.
    Lee, Bryan S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (04) : 763 - 768
  • [25] Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview
    Hanneke I. Berends
    Henricus L. Journée
    Ilona Rácz
    Jan van Loon
    Roger Härtl
    Maarten Spruit
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 1581 - 1586
  • [26] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With rhBMP-2 can Achieve High Fusion Rates in Adult Spine Deformity Surgeries
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    Oppermann, Marcelo
    Evaniew, Nathan
    Soroceanu, Alex
    Nicholls, Fred
    Jacobs, W. Bradley
    Thomas, Ken
    Swamy, Ganesh
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 244 - 256
  • [27] Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series
    Proietti, Luca
    Perna, Andrea
    Ricciardi, Luca
    Fumo, Caterina
    Santagada, Domenico Alessandro
    Giannelli, Ilaria
    Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro
    Leone, Antonio
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (02): : 250 - 257
  • [28] Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series
    Luca Proietti
    Andrea Perna
    Luca Ricciardi
    Caterina Fumo
    Domenico Alessandro Santagada
    Ilaria Giannelli
    Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
    Antonio Leone
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 250 - 257
  • [29] Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Van Pevenage, Peyton M.
    Tohmeh, Antoine G.
    Howell, Kelli M.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (09) : 3492 - 3502
  • [30] Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Tao, Yiqing
    Li, Fangcai
    Chen, Qixin
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 85 : 84 - 91