Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography

被引:38
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Hendrick, R. Edward [2 ]
Ruppel, Patricia [3 ]
Chersevani, Roberta
di Maggio, Cosimo
La Grassa, Manuela [4 ]
Pescarini, Luigi [1 ]
Polico, Ilaria [1 ]
Proietti, Alessandro [1 ]
Baldan, Enrica [1 ]
Bezzon, Elisabetta [1 ]
Pomerri, Fabio [1 ]
Muzzio, Pier Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Innovat Analyt, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA
[4] Oncol Reference Ctr CRO IRCCS, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy
关键词
Breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Tomography; Clinical performance; Receiver-operating characteristics; CLASSIFICATION; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-012-2649-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To determine the performance of combined single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view cranio-caudal (CC) mammography (MX) compared with that of standard two-view digital mammography. A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) study was conducted, involving six breast radiologists. Two hundred fifty patients underwent bilateral MX and DBT imaging. MX and DBT images with the adjunct of the CC-MX view from 469 breasts were evaluated and rated independently by six readers. Differences in mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), mean sensitivity and mean specificity were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess clinical performance. The combined technique was found to be non-inferior to standard two-view mammography (MX(CC+MLO)) in mean AUC (difference: +0.021;95 % LCL = -0.011), but was not statistically significant for superiority (P = 0.197). The combined technique had equivalent sensitivity to standard mammography (76.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.269) and equivalent specificity (84.9 % vs. 83.0 %, P = 0.130). Specificity for benign lesions was significantly higher with the combination of techniques versus mammography (45.6 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.002). In this enriched study population, the combination of single-view MLO tomosynthesis plus single-view CC mammography was non-inferior to that of standard two-view digital mammography in terms of ROC curve area, sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 672
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings [J].
Andersson, Ingvar ;
Ikeda, Debra M. ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Ruschin, Mark ;
Svahn, Tony ;
Timberg, Pontus ;
Tingberg, Anders .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) :2817-2825
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]  
Chakrabarti K, 2010, P080003 HOLOGIC SELE
[4]   Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols [J].
Dance, D. R. ;
Young, K. C. ;
van Engen, R. E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) :453-471
[5]   Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study [J].
Gennaro, Gisella ;
Toledano, Alicia ;
di Maggio, Cosimo ;
Baldan, Enrica ;
Bezzon, Elisabetta ;
La Grassa, Manuela ;
Pescarini, Luigi ;
Polico, Ilaria ;
Proietti, Alessandro ;
Toffoli, Aida ;
Muzzio, Pier Carlo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) :1545-1553
[6]   Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study [J].
Good, Walter F. ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Catullo, Victor J. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Gur, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :865-869
[7]   The "Laboratory" effect: Comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations [J].
Gur, David ;
Bandos, Andriy I. ;
Cohen, Cathy S. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Hardesty, Lara A. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Perrin, Ronald L. ;
Poller, William R. ;
Shah, Ratan ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Wallace, Luisa P. ;
Rockette, Howard E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (01) :47-53
[8]   Localized Detection and Classification of Abnormalities on FFDM and Tomosynthesis Examinations Rated Under an FROC Paradigm [J].
Gur, David ;
Bandos, Andriy I. ;
Rockette, Howard E. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) :737-741
[9]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study [J].
Gur, David ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Perrin, Ronald L. ;
Rathfon, Grace Y. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Bandos, Andriy I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) :586-591
[10]   A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis [J].
Hillis, Stephen L. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (03) :596-619