Investing for Retirement: The Moderating Effect of Fund Assortment Size on the 1/N Heuristic

被引:25
作者
Morrin, Maureen [1 ]
Inman, J. Jeffrey [2 ]
Broniarczyk, Susan M. [3 ]
Nenkov, Gergana Y. [4 ]
Reuter, Jonathan [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Business, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Joseph M Katz Grad Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
retirement; investment decisions; 401(k); asset allocation; 1/n heuristic; diversification; INVESTMENT CHOICES; VARIETY; DISPOSITION; MECHANISM; ACCOUNTS; SAVINGS; CREDIT; PLANS; STOCK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1509/jmr.08.0355
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Does the number of funds offered in a defined contribution plan affect how many funds consumers choose to invest in or how they spread dollars across the funds they choose? Across three experiments and the analysis of defined contribution plan data, the authors explore these issues by examining investors' tendency to engage in the 1/n heuristic-that is, allocating their dollars evenly across all available investment options. The authors decompose this heuristic into its two underlying behavioral dimensions: the tendency to invest in all available funds (which they label "1/n(#)") and the tendency to spread the invested dollars evenly across chosen funds (which they label "1/n($)"). The authors argue that choosing from larger fund assortments taxes investors' cognitive resources, which leads to more simplified diversification strategies. They find that increasing the fund assortment size decreases the tendency to invest in all available funds (1/n(#)) but increases the tendency to spread the invested dollars evenly among the chosen alternatives (1/n($)), provided that the number of funds chosen for investment allows for easy equal dollar allocations. The authors integrate their results with prior research regarding asset choice and allocation heuristics.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 550
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Cengage Learning
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PARADOX CHOICE
[3]   The Perceived Diversity Heuristic: The Case of Pseudodiversity [J].
Ayal, Shahar ;
Zakay, Dan .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (03) :559-573
[4]   VARIETY IN RETAILING [J].
BAUMOL, WJ ;
IDE, EA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1956, 3 (01) :93-101
[5]   Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :79-98
[6]  
Broniarczyk S., 2008, Handbook of Consumer Psychology, P755
[7]  
Chalmers J., 2012, What is the impact of financial advisors on retirement portfolio choices and outcomes
[8]  
Chen S, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P73
[9]   When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice [J].
Chernev, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (02) :170-183
[10]   Dual processing in reasoning - Two systems but one reasoner [J].
de Neys, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (05) :428-433